Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul;26(7):e70101.
doi: 10.1002/acm2.70101. Epub 2025 Apr 8.

Log file-based quality assurance method for respiratory gating system

Affiliations

Log file-based quality assurance method for respiratory gating system

Wonjoong Cheon et al. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2025 Jul.

Abstract

Background: As medical linear accelerator technology advances, enabling higher dose rate deliveries, hypofractionation regimens has increased. This necessitates respiratory gating systems that synchronize radiation delivery with tumor position, requiring simple rigorous quality assurance (QA) to ensure treatment accuracy and patient safety.

Purpose: This study aimed to propose log-based QA for respiratory-gated radiation therapy using the respiratory gating system and treatment machine.

Methods: 4D CT scans were performed with a Varian motion phantom using a Varian Respiratory Gating for Scanner (RGSC). A treatment plan using 25%-75% respiratory phases with 100 MU was created and delivered to a solid water phantom. Treatment logs containing respiratory signals, beam on/off flags, and frame information were extracted from the treatment planning system's offline review. Log file analyses were conducted using in-house softwares to assess temporal synchronization between respiratory phases and beam triggers. Output measurements using a calibrated ion chamber (FC65G) were performed to evaluate dosimetric accuracy. Additionally, EPID images were acquired in cine mode and analyzed frame-by-frame to independently verify beam delivery timing.

Results: Log file analysis revealed precise temporal synchronization, with mean time differences of 0.03 s ± 0.05 s between the planned 25% phase and beam-on, and -0.04 s ± 0.05 s between 75% phase and beam-off. The log-derived beam-on duration (2.61 s ± 0.02 s) closely matched the planned duration (2.66 s ± 0.00 s). Three-month log data showed consistent temporal accuracy, with trigger-on times remaining stable at 2.60 s ± 0.01 s across all measurements. Supporting ion chamber measurements confirmed dosimetric agreement between gating and non-gating modes (difference: 0.05 cGy ± 0.09 cGy) CONCLUSIONS: The proposed log file-based QA method demonstrated high accuracy and reproducibility in assessing respiratory gating performance. This approach provides an efficient, objective method for standardizing QA procedures in respiratory-gated radiation therapy, enhancing treatment accuracy and patient safety.

Keywords: Log file‐based analysis; RGSC (Respiratory Gating for Scanner) system; quality assurance (QA); radiation therapy; respiratory gating.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Study diagram for log‐based quality assurance for respiratory‐guided radiation therapy.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Experimental setup for log‐based respiratory gating system quality assurance showing the Varian motion phantom with reflector block and solid water slab phantoms in the treatment room.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
(a) Average periodic signal indicating the planned phase interval from 25% to 75%. (b) Trigger‐on times extracted from the treatment log file. (c) periodic analysis for respiratory gating treatment (red star: 25%, 75% phase, red line: trigger on/off).

Similar articles

References

    1. Keall PJ, Mageras GS, Balter JM, et al. The management of respiratory motion in radiation oncology report of AAPM Task Group 76. Med Phys. 2006;33(10):3874‐3900. doi: 10.1118/1.2349696 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mageras GS, Yorke E. Deep inspiration breath hold and respiratory gating strategies for reducing organ motion in radiation treatment. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2004;14(1):65‐75. doi: 10.1053/j.semradonc.2003.10.009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Choun HJ, Kim J‐i, Park JM, Son J. Development of a breath control training system for breath‐hold techniques and respiratory‐gated radiation therapy. Prog Med Phys. 2022;33(4):136‐141. doi: 10.14316/pmp.2022.33.4.136 - DOI
    1. Keall PJ, Mageras GS, Balter JM, et al. The management of respiratory motion in radiation oncology report of AAPM Task Group 76 a. Med Phys. 2006;33(10):3874‐3900. - PubMed
    1. Klein EE, Hanley J, Bayouth J, et al. Task Group 142 report: quality assurance of medical accelerators a. Med Phys. 2009;36(9):4197‐4212. doi: 10.1118/1.3190392 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms