Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar-Apr;32(2):e70001.
doi: 10.1111/xen.70001.

International Xenotransplantation Association (IXA) Position Paper on Infectious Disease Considerations in Xenotransplantation

Affiliations

International Xenotransplantation Association (IXA) Position Paper on Infectious Disease Considerations in Xenotransplantation

Jay A Fishman et al. Xenotransplantation. 2025 Mar-Apr.

Abstract

Clinical xenotransplantation has the potential to address shortages of human organs for patients with end-stage organ failure. Advances in genetic engineering, immunosuppressive regimens, and infectious disease diagnostics have improved prospects for clinical xenotransplantation. Management of the infectious risks posed by clinical xenotransplantation requires biosecure breeding and validated methods for microbiological surveillance of source animals and recipients. Novel infection control protocols may complement biosafety requirements. Infectious risks in xenotransplantation include both known human pathogens common to immunosuppressed organ recipients and from porcine organisms or xenozoonoses for which the clinical manifestations are less well defined and for which microbial assays and therapies are more limited. Some pig-specific organisms do not infect human cells but have systemic manifestations when active within the xenograft. The human risk posed by porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERV) is uncertain. There are no documented transmissions of PERV in humans and swine are available with inactivated genomic PERV loci. Metagenomic sequencing will complement more traditional diagnostic tools in the detection of any unknown pathogens in xenotransplantation recipients. Such data are required for the development of protocols for donor and recipient microbiological surveillance, infection control, and antimicrobial therapies that will enhance the safety of clinical xenotransplantation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. A. Nellore, J. Walker, M. J. Kahn, and J. A. Fishman, “Moving Xenotransplantation From Bench to Bedside: Managing Infectious Risk,” Transplant Infectious Disease: An Official Journal of the Transplantation Society 24, no. 6 (2022): e13909, https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.13909.
    1. J. A. Fishman, “Risks of Infectious Disease in Xenotransplantation,” New England Journal of Medicine 387, no. 24 (2022): 2258–2267, https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra2207462.
    1. J. A. Fishman, “Infection in Solid‐Organ Transplant Recipients,” New England Journal of Medicine 357, no. 25 (2007): 2601–2614, https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra064928.
    1. J. A. Fishman, “Infection in Organ Transplantation,” American Journal of Transplantation 17, no. 4 (2017): 856–879, https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.14208.
    1. S. Wynyard, D. Nathu, O. Garkavenko, J. Denner, and R. Elliott, “Microbiological Safety of the First Clinical Pig Islet Xenotransplantation Trial in New Zealand,” Xenotransplantation 21, no. 4 (2014): 309–323, https://doi.org/10.1111/xen.12102.

LinkOut - more resources