Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Mar-Apr;32(2):e70003.
doi: 10.1111/xen.70003.

International Xenotransplantation Association (IXA) Position Paper on Kidney Xenotransplantation

Affiliations
Review

International Xenotransplantation Association (IXA) Position Paper on Kidney Xenotransplantation

Raphael P H Meier et al. Xenotransplantation. 2025 Mar-Apr.

Abstract

Porcine kidney xenotransplantation for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) has reached the stage of clinical testing following major advances in donor pig genetic modifications and effective immunosuppressive strategies through decades of rigorous translational research. Reports of pig kidney xenograft survival beyond 1 year posttranplant in nonhuman primate (NHP) models justify optimism for its potential as an alternative to allotransplantation. In the United States, experimental transplantations of genetically engineered (GE) porcine kidneys into brain-dead subjects and a small number of ESRD patients have shown no evidence of hyperacute rejection and adequate pig kidney function for up to several months. Here we discuss pre-clinical/clinical results, infectious disease, ethical, and regulatory considerations, and propose evidence-based recommendations. For initial clinical trials in kidney xenotransplantation, we make the following recommendations: (i) transplantation with organs from a triple knockout (TKO) donor pig, preferably with added human transgenes, (ii) an immunosuppressive regimen with induction therapy to deplete T (and possibly B) cells, and maintenance therapy based on a cluster of differentiation (CD)40/CD154 co-stimulation pathway blockade, (iii) the patient should be fully acceptable as a candidate for allotransplantation but should be unlikely ever to receive an allograft. Patients aged 60-69 years (extendable to 40-75 years, if one of the criteria mentioned below is present), of blood group B or O, and with diabetes are most at risk in this regard. Other patients who could be considered are (i) those who have lost two or more previous kidney allografts from recurrent disease in the graft, (ii) those with broad human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-reactivity but no evidence of anti-pig antibodies, including swine leukocyte antigen (SLA), and (iii) those with failing vascular access. Clinical pilot studies in carefully and highly selected patients with no alternative therapy will provide the foundation upon which to base subsequent formal expanded clinical trials.

Keywords: end‐stage renal disease; genetic engineering; immunosuppression; kidney; pig; xenotransplantation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. A. B. Adams, B. P. Lovasik, D. A. Faber, et al., “Anti‐C5 Antibody Tesidolumab Reduces Early Antibody‐Mediated Rejection and Prolongs Survival in Renal Xenotransplantation,” Annals of Surgery 274, no. 3 (2021): 473–480.
    1. S. C. Kim, D. V. Mathews, C. P. Breeden, et al., “Long‐Term Survival of Pig‐to‐Rhesus Macaque Renal Xenografts Is Dependent on CD4 T Cell Depletion,” American Journal of Transplantation 19, no. 8 (2019): 2174–2185.
    1. D. Ma, T. Hirose, G. Lassiter, et al., “Kidney Transplantation From Triple‐Knockout Pigs Expressing Multiple Human Proteins in Cynomolgus Macaques,” American Journal of Transplantation 22, no. 1 (2022): 46–57.
    1. J. R. Butler, J. M. Ladowski, G. R. Martens, M. Tector, and A. J. Tector, “Recent Advances in Genome Editing and Creation of Genetically Modified Pigs,” International Journal of Surgery 23, no. Pt B (2015): 217–222.
    1. R. P. Anand, J. V. Layer, D. Heja, et al., “Design and Testing of a Humanized Porcine Donor for Xenotransplantation,” Nature 622, no. 7982 (2023): 393–401.

Publication types

MeSH terms