The value of large-scale programmes in human genomics
- PMID: 40200064
- PMCID: PMC12048586
- DOI: 10.1038/s41431-025-01844-7
The value of large-scale programmes in human genomics
Abstract
Large national genomic programmes have been created in many countries, including France, England and Germany, to advance the realisation of the potential genomic medicine holds to significantly contribute to society by improving health, and driving science, innovation and the economy. To reach this ambition, these programmes collect, manage and analyse big genomic datasets. While there is much talk about the promises, and hence the importance of genomics, there is little in-depth analysis of the actual contribution or value—here understood as benefits—of genomics for society at large. To explore the issue of the value of large-scale genomic programmes for society, UK-FR-D+ GENE held an international workshop focusing on a variety of levels—societal, economic, clinical, scientific, and population-wide level—at which such benefits might be observed. First, the broader societal implications of large genome programmes and their impact for public trust were discussed. Second, the meaning of fair and just allocation of public resources, based on considerations of the economic costs and benefits of genomic innovations, was examined. Third, the benefits of these innovations for stakeholders (clinicians, patients, and families) at the clinical level were investigated. Fourth, the scope and limitations of genomics at the scientific level were discussed. Finally, the potential of genomics to improve health at the population level was explored. Providing an insight into the benefits of large genomic programmes on various levels, the workshop concluded by defining several criteria that should be considered to ensure benefits for society when implementing large genomic programmes.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: JB reports travel funding from Illumina, Inc. and consulting income from Genomics England. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
The implementation of large-scale genomic screening or diagnostic programmes: A rapid evidence review.Eur J Hum Genet. 2023 Mar;31(3):282-295. doi: 10.1038/s41431-022-01259-8. Epub 2022 Dec 14. Eur J Hum Genet. 2023. PMID: 36517584 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Trends in large-scale mouse mutagenesis: from genetics to functional genomics.Nat Rev Genet. 2008 Oct;9(10):803-10. doi: 10.1038/nrg2431. Nat Rev Genet. 2008. PMID: 18781157 Review.
-
Making decisions for structural genomics.Brief Bioinform. 2003 Jun;4(2):150-67. doi: 10.1093/bib/4.2.150. Brief Bioinform. 2003. PMID: 12846396
-
Exercise genomics--a paradigm shift is needed: a commentary.Br J Sports Med. 2015 Dec;49(23):1492-6. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095294. Epub 2015 Oct 1. Br J Sports Med. 2015. PMID: 26429807 Review.
-
Implementing a national programme of pathogen genomics for public health: the Australian Pathogen Genomics Program (AusPathoGen).Lancet Microbe. 2025 Mar;6(3):100969. doi: 10.1016/j.lanmic.2024.100969. Epub 2024 Oct 8. Lancet Microbe. 2025. PMID: 39389079 Review.
Cited by
-
A Value Framework for Evaluating Population Genomic Programs: A Mixed Methods Approach.J Pers Med. 2025 Jul 12;15(7):307. doi: 10.3390/jpm15070307. J Pers Med. 2025. PMID: 40710424 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Prainsack B, El-Sayed S, Forgó N, Szoszkiewicz Ł, Baumer P. Data solidarity: a blueprint for governing health futures. Lancet Digit Health. 2022;4:e773–e4. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources