Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 4;6(1):52-59.
doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2024.11.008. eCollection 2025 Mar.

Novel sonographic reference charts for early pregnancy based on known gestational age

Affiliations

Novel sonographic reference charts for early pregnancy based on known gestational age

Julia Häusler et al. F S Rep. .

Abstract

Objective: To study pregnancy dating, we developed growth charts using data from pregnancies with known gestational age. The most widely used growth charts for ultrasonographic early pregnancy variables were developed decades ago and are based on dating by the last menstrual period. The aims of the study were to create growth charts for early pregnancy (including crown-rump length, gestational sac diameter, yolk sac diameter, and amniotic cavity diameter) for last menstrual period-dated spontaneous pregnancies and pregnancies conceived through assisted reproductive technology (ART) with known gestational age; and to compare crown-rump length measurements with two established traditional charts based on last menstrual period dating.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Subjects: Of 1,061 singletons, 2,803 crown-rump length measurements from 716 exactly dated ART gestations with 1,143 crown-rump length measurements from 345 spontaneous pregnancies, which were dated by the last menstrual period in women with regular cycles, were compared using nonlinear quantile regression.

Exposure: A total of 716 ART pregnancies and 345 spontaneous pregnancies underwent ultrasound examinations, with a median of four visits at various points during the first trimester.

Main outcome measures: Early pregnancy dating with growth charts based on crown-rump length, gestational sac-, yolk sac- and amniotic cavity diameter.

Results: Novel reference charts for ultrasound dating of gestational age based on crown-rump length from 4 + 6 to 10 + 6 gestational weeks were created. The difference of the 10th and 90th percentile was significantly higher in spontaneous compared with ART pregnancies (P<.05). For the same crown-rump length, the gestational age of spontaneous pregnancies was estimated to be up to 4.08 days older than in ART pregnancies at the 90th percentile. Preexisting curves (Robinson/Fleming, Hadlock) aligned closely with the new reference curve mid-range but showed larger deviations at the extremes of assessed gestational ages.

Conclusion: Early pregnancy crown-rump length curves based on last menstrual period may overestimate gestational age. Using 2,803 crown-rump length measurements, we propose the current comprehensive charts for early pregnancy within a population with known gestational age for crown-rump length, gestational sac diameter, yolk sac diameter, and amniotic cavity diameter.

Keywords: Crown-rump length; first trimester; gestational sac; growth charts; ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

J.H. has nothing to disclose. A.Q. has nothing to disclose. M.F. has nothing to disclose. A.S. has nothing to disclose. F.P. has nothing to disclose. C.D.G. has nothing to disclose. U.G.-K. has nothing to disclose. B.M. has nothing to disclose. G.M.-B. has nothing to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient inclusion flowchart. CRL= crown-rump length.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The 10th, 50th, and 90th percentiles of the predicted gestational age based on crown-rump length measurements, for both assisted reproductive technology pregnancies (green) and spontaneous pregnancies (red). Individual data points for spontaneous pregnancies are plotted as gray dots.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Crown-rump length measurements by gestational age for assisted reproductive technology pregnancies with 10th, 50th, and 90th centiles (red). Existing reference curves inserted for comparison: Hadlock curve (light green) and Robinson/Fleming curve (purple).
Supplementary Figure 1
Supplementary Figure 1
Differences between the predicted median gestational age of the assisted reproductive technology pregnancies compared to the curve of Hadlock (light green) and the curve of Robinson/Fleming (purple).
Supplementary Figure 2
Supplementary Figure 2
Mean gestational sac diameter measurements by gestational age with 10th, 50th, and 90th centiles for 716 assisted reproductive technology pregnancies (n = 3,190 measurements). Grey dots correspond to gestational sac diameter measurements of assisted reproductive technology pregnancies.
Supplementary Figure 3
Supplementary Figure 3
Mean yolk sac diameter measurements by gestational age with 10th, 50th, and 90th centiles for 716 assisted reproductive technology pregnancies (n = 3,001 measurements). Grey dots correspond to yolk sac diameter measurements of assisted reproductive technology pregnancies.
Supplementary Figure 4
Supplementary Figure 4
Mean amniotic cavity diameter measurements by gestational age with 10th, 50th, and 90th centiles for 716 assisted reproductive technology pregnancies (n = 1,320 measurements). Grey dots correspond to amniotic cavity diameter measurements of assisted reproductive technology pregnancies.

References

    1. Whitworth M., Bricker L., Mullan C. Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2015:CD007058. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berdahl D.M., Blaine J., van Voorhis B., Dokras A. Detection of enlarged yolk sac on early ultrasound is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:1535–1537. - PubMed
    1. Caughey A.B., Nicholson J.M., Washington A.E. First- vs second-trimester ultrasound: the effect on pregnancy dating and perinatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198:703.e1–703.e5. [discussion 703.e5–6] - PMC - PubMed
    1. Doubilet P.M. Should a first trimester dating scan be routine for all pregnancies? Semin Perinatol. 2013;37:307–309. - PubMed
    1. Olesen A.W., Thomsen S.G. Prediction of delivery date by sonography in the first and second trimesters. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;28:292–297. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources