How to quantify magic spots - a brief overview of (p)ppGpp detection and quantitation methods
- PMID: 40201240
- PMCID: PMC11976733
- DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2025.1574135
How to quantify magic spots - a brief overview of (p)ppGpp detection and quantitation methods
Abstract
Guanosine tetra- and penta-phosphates, collectively known as (p)ppGpp, are well-known second messengers of cellular stress responses in bacteria and plants. Their intracellular concentration is tightly regulated and can vary widely-from undetectable levels under optimal growth conditions, through intermediate concentrations, to extremely high levels that match or even exceed GTP concentrations when cells are exposed to severe stress. Importantly, the effects exerted by (p)ppGpp are often concentration-dependent, making their quantitative analysis a crucial aspect of studying cellular responses to stress. To gain a deeper understanding of the regulatory mechanisms associated with (p)ppGpp, it is essential to monitor its accumulation in vivo and conduct detailed molecular studies in vitro. Various methods have been developed for detecting and quantifying (p)ppGpp, enabling researchers to track its levels in living cells and analyse its function under controlled laboratory conditions. In this work, we provide an overview of the available techniques for (p)ppGpp detection and quantification. We present their advantages, limitations, and potential applications in research on metabolic regulation and cellular stress responses.
Keywords: (p)ppApp; (p)ppGpp; alarmones; chromatography; in vivo and in vitro quantification; nucleotides; stress response; stringent response.
Copyright © 2025 Gąsior, Klasa and Potrykus.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Similar articles
-
Structure-function comparisons of (p)ppApp vs (p)ppGpp for Escherichia coli RNA polymerase binding sites and for rrnB P1 promoter regulatory responses in vitro.Biochim Biophys Acta Gene Regul Mech. 2018 Aug;1861(8):731-742. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2018.07.005. Epub 2018 Jul 18. Biochim Biophys Acta Gene Regul Mech. 2018. PMID: 30012465 Free PMC article.
-
The stringent response of marine bacteria - assessment of (p)ppGpp accumulation upon stress conditions.J Appl Genet. 2020 Feb;61(1):123-130. doi: 10.1007/s13353-019-00531-w. Epub 2019 Nov 26. J Appl Genet. 2020. PMID: 31773499
-
Within and beyond the stringent response-RSH and (p)ppGpp in plants.Planta. 2017 Nov;246(5):817-842. doi: 10.1007/s00425-017-2780-y. Epub 2017 Sep 25. Planta. 2017. PMID: 28948393 Free PMC article. Review.
-
From (p)ppGpp to (pp)pGpp: Characterization of Regulatory Effects of pGpp Synthesized by the Small Alarmone Synthetase of Enterococcus faecalis.J Bacteriol. 2015 Sep;197(18):2908-19. doi: 10.1128/JB.00324-15. Epub 2015 Jun 29. J Bacteriol. 2015. PMID: 26124242 Free PMC article.
-
Regulatory Themes and Variations by the Stress-Signaling Nucleotide Alarmones (p)ppGpp in Bacteria.Annu Rev Genet. 2021 Nov 23;55:115-133. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-021821-025827. Epub 2021 Aug 20. Annu Rev Genet. 2021. PMID: 34416118 Review.
References
-
- Bruhn-Olszewska B., Molodtsov V., Sobala M., Dylewski M., Murakami K. S., Cashel M., et al. (2018). Structure-function comparisons of (p)ppApp vs (p)ppGpp for Escherichia coli RNA polymerase binding sites and for rrnB P1 promoter regulatory responses in vitro . Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1861 (8), 731–742. 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2018.07.005 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources