Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar 25:13:1537049.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1537049. eCollection 2025.

The effect of COVID vaccination timing on the seroprevalence of IgG antibodies: evidence from the Guayas region of Ecuador

Affiliations

The effect of COVID vaccination timing on the seroprevalence of IgG antibodies: evidence from the Guayas region of Ecuador

Aurora Malacatus-Arboleda et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

Background and aims: Timely distribution of COVID-19 vaccines was particularly important for developing countries that do not have strong health systems and related infrastructure. We analyze data from the Guayas province of Ecuador, an area particularly affected by the pandemic, to determine the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 and the effect of the timing of the second dose of COVID-19 vaccines on the seroprevalence SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies.

Methods: This cross-sectional study involved 1,761 individuals aged 18 and older who voluntarily enrolled prior to and during the initial phase of vaccine rollout in Ecuador (October 2020 to July 2022). IgG anti-SARS-CoV-2 RBD antibodies were assessed by an in-house ELISA to evaluate the immune response to Pfizer (BioNTech, Spike mRNA) and AstraZeneca (Oxford, AstraZeneca Spike) vaccine in the Guayas province. Ordinary least squares (OLS) regressions were employed to determine the effect of delayed second doses later than prescribed by the manufacturer for both vaccines.

Results: Before the vaccination campaign, we estimated an RBD IgG seroprevalence of 27.7% (95% CI: 23.6-27, n = 469). The estimate increased to 89.4% (95% CI: 87.7-91.18, n = 1,235) after the first vaccine dose and to 92.6% (95% CI: 90.7-94.5, n = 748) after the second dose. Individuals who received the second dose of the Pfizer vaccine later than the recommended dose showed significantly lower levels of IgG antibodies 2-3 weeks after receiving the second dose than those who received the dose within the recommended timeframe. Furthermore, we did not find any effect on RBD IgG antibody levels in those who received a second dose of the AstraZeneca vaccine during the first and second parts of the recommended vaccination window.

Conclusion: The results suggest that a significant portion of the study population was already infected with SARS-CoV-2 prior to the vaccination. As expected, seropositivity increased alongside vaccination efforts. We determined that Pfizer vaccine recipients should be adhered to vaccine timing guidelines. Furthermore, resource-limited countries should consider administering vaccines with flexibility in dosing intervals, such as AstraZeneca, as it allows for a wider time frame without significantly reducing the boosting of IgG antibodies.

Keywords: COVID-19; IgG; SARS-CoV-2 RBD; cross-sectional study; in-house ELISA assay; seroprevalence; vaccine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Joinpoint analysis of the levels of seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 over time. This figure shows the months in which samples were collected during the ELISA testing program. *indicates that the percentage change is significantly different from zero at the alpha = 0.05 level.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Average seroprevalence of IgG RBD antibodies according to the number of vaccines received.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Average RBD IgG levels from those who received the second dose of the Pfizer (left) or AstraZeneca (right) vaccines, during or outside of the recommended time frames after the first dose, respectively (95% C.I).

Similar articles

References

    1. Li JY, You Z, Wang Q, Zhou ZJ, Qiu Y, Luo R, et al. . The epidemic of 2019-novel-coronavirus (2019-nCoV) pneumonia and insights for emerging infectious diseases in the future. Microbes Infect. (2020) 22:80–5. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2020.02.002, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Javed W, Abidi SHB, Baqar JB. Seroprevalence and characteristics of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in workers with non-specific disease symptoms. BMC Infect Dis. (2022) 22:481. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07461-9, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Karlinsky A, Kobak D. Tracking excess mortality across countries during the COVID-19 pandemic with the world mortality dataset. eLife. (2021) 10:e69336. doi: 10.7554/eLife.69336, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Molina GA, Ayala AV, Endara SA, Aguayo WG, Rojas CL, Jiménez GE, et al. . Ecuador and Covid-19: a pandemic we won’t be able to run away from. Int J Infect Dis. (2021) 109:33–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.05.077, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Monge S, Rojas-Benedicto A, Olmedo C, Martín-Merino E, Mazagatos C, Limia A, et al. . Effectiveness of a second dose of an mRNA vaccine against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) omicron infection in individuals previously infected by other variants. Clin Infect Dis. (2023) 76:e367–74. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac429, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms