Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan 28;59(3):256-270.
doi: 10.1007/s43465-024-01332-y. eCollection 2025 Mar.

Biomechanical Considerations in Osteoporotic Fracture Fixation

Affiliations

Biomechanical Considerations in Osteoporotic Fracture Fixation

Ritabh Kumar. Indian J Orthop. .

Abstract

Background: Osteoporotic Fractures (OF) present formidable but predictable challenges in fixation. With ageing the bone mineral density is reduced and the internal micro-architecture is disrupted. This increases fracture risk and makes implant hold tenuous. Newer implant technology has helped improve fracture fixation but the risks of early mechanical failure remain tangible.

Purpose: After fracture reduction and fixation, the surgeon remains apprehensive regarding rehabilitation. The concerns are higher in the lower limb where non-weight bearing is not possible. Understanding basic mechanics and translating that knowledge to fracture surgery helps provide secure surgical stability to enable full weight bearing assisted mobilization.

Conclusion: Applying the logic of mechanics to living biological tissue will help the surgeon better understand the unique mechanical requirements of the fractured bone. Judicious surgical technique and careful combination of implants balancing the mechanical and biological needs of the ageing broken bone will help it heal. Integrating technology and surgical technique with the established principles of osteosynthesis will help improve functional outcomes in OF.

Keywords: Area moment of inertia; Biomechanics; Bone mineral density; Microarchitecture; Osteoporosis; Stainless steel; Titanium.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interestThe author declares no conflict of interest. The images included in the manuscript are all original. Sketches have been made by the author.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tencer, A. F., & Johnson, K. D. (1994). Biomechanics in orthopaedic trauma. Martin Dunitz.
    1. Brandi, M. L. (2009). Microarchitecture, the key to bone quality. Rheumatology,48, iv3–iv8. - PubMed
    1. An, Y. H. (2003). Orthopaedic issues in osteoporosis. CRC Press.
    1. van der Meulen, M. C. H., Wright, T., & Chen, J. T. (2016). Musculoskeletal biomechanics. Orthopaedic Knowledge Online Journal,14(8), 3. 10.5435/OKOJ14-8-3
    1. Chappard, D., Basle, M.-F., Legrand, E., & Audran, M. (2008). Trabecular bone microarchitecture: A review. Morphologie,92, 162–170. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources