Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 9:8982643251331808.
doi: 10.1177/08982643251331808. Online ahead of print.

High-Impact Participation? Social Activities, Activity Frequency, and Older Adult Cognition

Affiliations

High-Impact Participation? Social Activities, Activity Frequency, and Older Adult Cognition

Eric M Vogelsang et al. J Aging Health. .

Abstract

ObjectivesThere is growing recognition that social participation may help attenuate cognitive decline in older ages. Unfortunately, previous research often relies on participation index measures, which may obfuscate associations among cognition, specific activities, and the frequency of partaking in those activities.MethodsData are from six waves of the Health and Retirement Study (N = 20,696). Regression models test how associations between social participation and cognition vary by social activity and by multiple specifications of activity frequency.ResultsUsing a participation index, any new activity or increase in activity frequency was positively associated with cognition. When segregating activities, only three activities had positive associations: meeting friends, volunteering, and being a part of community organizations. We find limited evidence that activity frequency is an important moderator.DiscussionSocial activities likely have heterogeneous associations with older adult cognition. The frequency threshold linking social participation to cognition may be "any" regular participation in select activities.

Keywords: cognitive functioning; measurement; social participation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Similar articles

References

    1. Amano T, Morrow-Howell N, & Park S (2020). Patterns of social engagement among older adults with mild cognitive impairment. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 75(7), 1361–1371. 10.1093/geronb/gbz051 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bianchi F, Piolatto M, Marengoni A, & Squazzoni F (2023). Structure of personal networks and cognitive abilities: A study on a sample of Italian older adults. Social Networks, 74, 71–77. 10.1016/j.socnet.2023.02.005 - DOI
    1. Bourassa KJ, Memel M, Woolverton C, & Sbarra DA (2017). Social participation predicts cognitive functioning in aging adults over time: Comparisons with physical health, depression, and physical activity. Aging & Mental Health, 21(2), 133–146. 10.1080/13607863.2015.1081152 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carlson MC, Erickson KI, Kramer AF, Voss MW, Bolea N, Mielke M, McGill S, Rebok GW, Seeman T, & Fried LP (2009). Evidence for neurocognitive plasticity in at-risk older adults: The experience corps program. The Journals of Gerontology Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 64(12), 1275–1282. 10.1093/gerona/glp117 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen R, Calmasini C, Swinnerton K, Wang J, Haneuse S, Ackley SF, Hirst AK, Hayes-Larson E, George KM, Peterson R, Soh Y, Barnes LL, Mayeda ER, Gilsanz P, Mungas DM, Whitmer RA, Corrada MM, & Glymour MM (2023). Pragmatic approaches to handling practice effects in longitudinal cognitive aging research. Alzheimer’s and Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer’s Association, 19(9), 4028–4036. 10.1002/alz.13067 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources