Correlation of the LLRS-AIM Index With LD-SRS and PROMIS in Pediatric Patients With Lower Limb Differences
- PMID: 40202263
- DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002916
Correlation of the LLRS-AIM Index With LD-SRS and PROMIS in Pediatric Patients With Lower Limb Differences
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of the Limb Lengthening and Reconstruction Society AIM (LLRS-AIM) index, a scale for grading the severity of lower limb deformities by the physician, and its concordance with 2 patient-reported outcome measures, the Limb Deformity-Scoliosis Research Society (LD-SRS) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) tools in pediatric patients with lower limb differences.
Methods: This was a retrospective review of patients 18 years old or younger who presented to our institution with lower limb differences for surgical reconstruction between 2019 and 2024. All patients received the LD-SRS and PROMIS for completion before surgery. The LLRS-AIM index for patients was assessed by 2 independent evaluators, with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) calculated to determine inter-rater agreement. Spearman correlations were performed between the LLRS-AIM Index with all LD-SRS and PROMIS domains. The Benjamini-Hochberg procedure was conducted to reduce the false discovery rate.
Results: A total of 81 patients were included in this study. The LLRS-AIM Index had good and near-perfect inter-rater reliability across different levels of medical training (ICC=0.9). Overall, there were no correlations between the LLRS-AIM Index with LD-SRS and PROMIS domains (LD-SRS function: P=-0.26, P=0.18; PROMIS pain interference: P=0.10, P=0.63). Mental health-related LD-SRS and PROMIS domains showed no correlations with the physician-reported LLRS-AIM index (LD-SRS self image: P=0.10, P=0.63; PROMIS depression: P=-0.05, P=0.63).
Conclusions: There is a high level of reproducibility for the LLRS-AIM index to evaluate the complexity of lower limb differences in pediatric patients. However, there are no correlations between the LLRS-AIM index with LD-SRS and PROMIS across all relevant domains. Further modifications to the LLRS-AIM index criteria and scoring weights may allow it to better assess patient outcomes in the pediatric population.
Level of evidence: Level III.
Keywords: LD-SRS; LLRS-AIM index; PROMIS; correlation; lower limb deformity; lower limb differences; patient-reported outcome measures.
Copyright © 2025 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Concurrent Validity of PROMIS and LD-SRS Scores in Pediatric Patients With Lower Limb Differences.J Pediatr Orthop. 2024 Aug 1;44(7):433-437. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002700. Epub 2024 Apr 23. J Pediatr Orthop. 2024. PMID: 38650090
-
Limb Lengthening and Reconstruction Society AIM index reliably assesses lower limb deformity.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Feb;471(2):621-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2609-8. Epub 2012 Oct 2. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013. PMID: 23054511 Free PMC article.
-
Pediatric Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System is Equivalent to Scoliosis Research Society-22 in Assessing Health Status in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Oct 15;44(20):E1206-E1210. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003112. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019. PMID: 31574066
-
Evaluating the Correlation and Performance of PROMIS to SRS Questionnaires in Adult and Pediatric Spinal Deformity Patients.Spine Deform. 2019 Jan;7(1):118-124. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2018.05.010. Spine Deform. 2019. PMID: 30587304
-
Congenital Lower Extremity.Clin Plast Surg. 2025 Apr;52(2):295-300. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2024.08.011. Epub 2025 Jan 18. Clin Plast Surg. 2025. PMID: 39986890 Review.
References
-
- Marshall S, Haywood K, Fitzpatrick R. Impact of patient-reported outcome measures on routine practice: a structured review. J Eval Clin Pract. 2006;12:559–568.
-
- Wilson I, Bohm E, Lübbeke A, et al. Orthopaedic registries with patient-reported outcome measures. EFORT Open Rev. 2019;4:357–367.
-
- Asher M, Min Lai S, Burton D, et al. The reliability and concurrent validity of the scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2003;28:63–69.
-
- Wajngarten D, Campos JÁDB, Garcia PPNS. The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand scale in the evaluation of disability—a literature review. Med Lav. 2017;108:314–323.
-
- Martin RL, Kelly BT, Philippon MJ. Evidence of validity for the hip outcome score. Arthrosc. 2006;22:1304–1311.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials