Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025:2897:591-600.
doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4406-5_39.

Assessment of Bacterial Contamination in Semen

Affiliations

Assessment of Bacterial Contamination in Semen

Ferran Garriga et al. Methods Mol Biol. 2025.

Abstract

Semen contamination is one of the main issues of concern in livestock industry. While the presence of some bacteria in semen is considered as normal, high bacterial loads detrimentally affect sperm quality and fertilizing ability, thus having a negative repercussion on the efficiency of artificial insemination. For this reason, the present chapter focuses on the methods used for the assessment of semen contamination in farm animals. Routinely, bacterial culture is performed to assess the overall degree of contamination in sperm samples; in some cases, however, the identification of bacterial species is needed to determine the optimal antibiotic composition of semen preservation media and address whether those bacteria have developed antibiotic resistance. In addition, other techniques, such as scanning electron microscopy, can be used to evaluate sperm-bacteria interaction. This chapter also discusses the strategies to prevent bacteria contamination in semen. As the ejaculate is not a sterile fluid, media for preservation usually include, as aforementioned, antibiotics to avoid bacterial growth. Because of the mounting restriction in the usage of antibiotics, which is due to the increase of bacterial resistance, other approaches to prevent bacterial contamination of semen include preservation at low temperatures (5 °C) and the inclusion of alternative molecules such as antimicrobial peptides.

Keywords: Bacterial contamination; Bacterial culture; Bacterial identification; Livestock; Semen; Sperm.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Úbeda JL, Ausejo R, Dahmani Y et al (2013) Adverse effects of members of the Enterobacteriaceae family on boar sperm quality. Theriogenology 80:565–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.05.022 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sannat C, Nair A, Sahu SB et al (2015) Critical sources of bacterial contamination and adoption of standard sanitary protocol during semen collection and processing in Semen Station. Vet World 8:631–635. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2015.631-635 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Althouse GC, Lu KG (2005) Bacteriospermia in extended porcine semen. Theriogenology 63:573–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.09.031 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gączarzewicz D, Udała J, Piasecka M et al (2016) Bacterial contamination of boar semen and its relationship to sperm quality preserved in commercial extender containing gentamicin sulfate. Pol J Vet Sci 19:451–459. https://doi.org/10.1515/pjvs-2016-0057 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Prieto-Martínez N, Bussalleu E, Garcia-Bonavila E et al (2014) Effects of Enterobacter cloacae on boar sperm quality during liquid storage at 17°C. Anim Reprod Sci 148:72–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2014.05.008 - DOI - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources