Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025 Apr 9;20(4):e0320237.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320237. eCollection 2025.

Occupational respiratory symptoms and associated factors among street sweepers in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Belay Desye  1 , Abebe Kassa Geto  2 , Leykun Berhanu  1 , Chala Daba  1   3 , Gete Berihun  4
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Occupational respiratory symptoms and associated factors among street sweepers in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Belay Desye et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

In low- and middle-income countries, occupational exposure continues to be a serious public health concern. Because of their working conditions, street sweepers are particularly vulnerable to health hazards, with respiratory issues being the most common. The lack of comprehensive and inconsistence evidence on occupational respiratory symptoms among street sweepers, which exacerbates this issue. This study aimed to estimate the pooled prevalence of occupational respiratory symptoms and associated factors among street sweepers in low- and middle-income countries. A comprehensive search strategy was carried out using various databases, such as PubMed, Scientific Direct, HINARI and Google Scholar, and the grey literature. The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses were used. Microsoft Excel was used to extract the data, which was then transferred to STATA 14/SE software for analysis. The Joanna Briggs Institutes' quality appraisal tool was used to ensure the quality of the included articles. A random effects model was used to estimate the pooled prevalence. In this study, a subgroup analysis was employed to examine the potential sources of heterogeneity, and sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the effect of individual studies on the pooled results. To evaluate publication bias, the funnel plot and Egger's regression tests were employed. The pooled prevalence of occupational respiratory symptoms among street sweepers was estimated to be 47.35% (95% CI: 34.59-60.11). Among each respiratory symptom, cough was found to be the most prevalent at 38.37% (95% CI: 28.54-48.19). In this study, past dust exposure (OR = 2.84, 95% CI: 1.06-4.61), not using facemasks (OR = 2.67, 95% CI: 1.54-3.81), having more than five years of work experience (OR = 3.68, 95% CI: 1.66-5.7), and being between the ages of 38 and 47 (OR = 2.17, 95% CI: 1.07-3.27) were found to be predictor factors with occupational respiratory symptoms among street sweepers. Furthermore, there is no evidence of publication bias for this study. The findings of this study indicated a significant prevalence of occupational respiratory symptoms among street sweepers. Therefore, it is highly recommended to focus on the provision and proper use of personal protective equipment and to enhance occupational health and safety training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. PRISMA flow diagram of this study, 2024.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Forest plot for pooled prevalence of occupational respiratory symptoms among street sweepers in LMICs, 2024.
Fig 3
Fig 3. A sensitivity analysis of occupational respiratory symptoms among street sweepers in LMICs, 2024.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Funnel plot of occupational respiratory symptoms among street sweepers in LMICs, 2024.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Forest plot for factors affecting occupational respiratory symptoms among street sweepers in LMICs, 2024.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Cullinan P, Muñoz X, Suojalehto H, Agius R, Jindal S, Sigsgaard T, et al.. Occupational lung diseases: from old and novel exposures to effective preventive strategies. Lancet Respir Med. 2017;5(5):445–55. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)30424-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Antao VC, Pinheiro GA. Surveillance for occupational respiratory diseases in developing countries. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;36(3):449–54. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1549456 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fedotov I. Action towards prevention of occupational and non-communicable diseases. Geneva, Switzeralnd: ILO; 2011.
    1. Neghab M, Choobineh A. Work-related respiratory symptoms and ventilatory disorders among employees of a cement industry in Shiraz, Iran. J Occup Health. 2007;49(4):273–8. doi: 10.1539/joh.49.273 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Langley RL. Consequences of respiratory exposures in the farm environment. N C Med J. 2011;72(6):477–80. doi: 10.18043/ncm.72.6.477 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms