French reimbursement of health technologies: assessment is at the heart of the procedure
- PMID: 40204062
- DOI: 10.1016/j.lpm.2025.104279
French reimbursement of health technologies: assessment is at the heart of the procedure
Abstract
Background: In France, health technologies can be reimbursed by the national health insurance system. However, not all are eligible, and several steps are required. This article aims at deciphering the various procedures involved.
Methods: We first described the most common steps for reimbursement procedures, from authorisation to health technology assessment, including clinical evaluation and reimbursement decision. We then discussed certain specificities related to the nature of the health technologies (for example, vaccines among drugs, or digital medical devices (DMDs) among medical devices), and to the status of the procedure (derogatory vs. standard).
Findings: France benefits from several procedures aimed at reimbursing health products, and their number is increasing over time. They all share one common step, assessment, which is systematically performed from a clinical perspective and sometimes includes an organisational or an economic viewpoint, by a single actor: the French National Authority for Health (Haute Autorité de santé, HAS).
Conclusion and relevance: HAS evaluations are essential tools for informing healthcare decision-making, and ensuring that patients have access to safe, effective, and affordable treatments. The system will have to face new challenges in the coming years: the European regulation will pool certain procedural steps, there will be more self-directed DMDs on the market and new organizations set up to support innovation as well as scarce human and financial resources. Ultimately, it is all about constantly adapting to meet patients' needs, introducing new health technologies that offer added value and limited risks, while making the best possible use of available resources.
Keywords: Health technologies assessment; In vitro diagnostic medical devices; Medical devices; Medical or surgical procedures; Medicinal products.
Copyright © 2025 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors have no competing interests relevant to this paper to disclose.
Similar articles
-
French evaluation of innovative health technologies: Early access and fundings.Presse Med. 2025 Jun;54(2):104284. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2025.104284. Epub 2025 Apr 8. Presse Med. 2025. PMID: 40210188
-
National Authority for Health: France.Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2009 Jul;58:1-9. Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2009. PMID: 19639712
-
Use of the ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale to guide HTA recommendations on coverage and reimbursement for cancer medicines: a retrospective analysis.Lancet Oncol. 2024 Dec;25(12):1644-1654. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00505-9. Lancet Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39637889
-
Comparative Assessment of Reimbursement Recommendations by NICE and HAS for Oncology New Medicines Indicated for the Treatment of Solid Tumors from 2015 to 2021.Med Decis Making. 2023 Oct-Nov;43(7-8):961-972. doi: 10.1177/0272989X231188073. Epub 2023 Jul 22. Med Decis Making. 2023. PMID: 37480275 Review.
-
Using Real-World Evidence for Clinical Development to Address the Gap Between Marketing Authorisation and Reimbursement in European Countries: Insights From Literature Review.J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Apr;31(3):e70090. doi: 10.1111/jep.70090. J Eval Clin Pract. 2025. PMID: 40189820 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources