Comparison of the surgical difficulty between segment 7 and 8 partial liver resection untilizing the laparoscopic and open approaches
- PMID: 40205135
- DOI: 10.1007/s00595-025-03037-7
Comparison of the surgical difficulty between segment 7 and 8 partial liver resection untilizing the laparoscopic and open approaches
Abstract
Purpose: We aimed to investigate the differences in surgical difficulty between laparoscopic partial liver resections of segments 7 and 8.
Methods: We analyzed 173 patients who underwent partial liver resections of segments 7 or 8 between 2010 and 2022 at two institutions. We investigated differences in the surgical outcomes of each procedure using propensity score matching. We compared these outcomes with those of open partial liver resections for segments 7 and 8 to determine whether the differences were unique to the laparoscopic approach.
Results: Thirty and 54 patients underwent laparoscopic partial liver resections of segments 7 and 8. In the matched cohort (22 in each group), the operation time was significantly longer (377 vs. 278 min, P = 0.020) and the proportion of postoperative complications significantly higher in segment 7 (27% vs. 0%, P = 0.008). Forty-one and 48 patients underwent open partial liver resections of segments 7 and 8, respectively. There were no significant differences in the surgical outcomes between the segments in the matched cohort (20 in each group).
Conclusions: Laparoscopic partial liver resections of segment 7 may be more challenging than that of segment 8. This difference in difficulty was not observed in open partial liver resections.
Keywords: Laparoscopic partial liver resection; Open partial liver resection; Segment 7; Segment 8.
© 2025. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: Dr. Hidetoshi Gon, Akihiro Fujisawa, Shohei Komatsu, Motofumi Tanaka, Kenji Fukushima, Takeshi Urade, Toshihiko Yoshida, Keisuke Arai, Jun Ishida, Yoshihide Nanno, Daisuke Tsugawa, Hiroaki Yanagimoto, Hirochika Toyama, Masahiro Kido, and Takumi Fukumoto have no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Similar articles
-
Robotic versus laparoscopic resections of posterosuperior segments of the liver: a propensity score-matched comparison.Surg Endosc. 2016 Mar;30(3):1004-13. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4284-9. Epub 2015 Jun 27. Surg Endosc. 2016. PMID: 26123328
-
Comparison between the difficulty of laparoscopic limited liver resections of tumors located in segment 7 versus segment 8: An international multicenter propensity-score matched study.J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2023 Feb;30(2):177-191. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.1210. Epub 2022 Jul 20. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2023. PMID: 35758911
-
Suitability of Laparoscopic Liver Resection of Segment VII: a Retrospective Two-Center Study.J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Nov;26(11):2274-2281. doi: 10.1007/s11605-022-05389-8. Epub 2022 Jun 17. J Gastrointest Surg. 2022. PMID: 35713765
-
Pure abdominal laparoscopic approach versus thoraco-abdominal laparoscopic approach: What is the best technique for liver resection in segment 7 and segment 8? An answer from the Institut Mutualiste Montsouris experience with short- and long-term outcome evaluation.Surgery. 2023 May;173(5):1176-1183. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.12.007. Epub 2023 Jan 18. Surgery. 2023. PMID: 36669939 Review.
-
World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients.Ann Surg. 2009 Nov;250(5):831-41. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b0c4df. Ann Surg. 2009. PMID: 19801936 Review.
References
-
- Heimbach JK, Kulik LM, Finn RS, Sirlin CB, Abecassis MM, Roberts LR, et al. AASLD guidelines for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2018;67:358–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.29086 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Milazzo M, Todeschini L, Caimano M, Mattia A, Cristin L, Martinino A, et al. Surgical resection in colorectal liver metastasis: an umbrella review. Cancers (Basel). 2024;16:1849. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16101849 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Abu Hilal M, Aldrighetti L, Dagher I, Edwin B, Troisi RI, Alikhanov R, et al. The Southampton consensus guidelines for laparoscopic liver surgery: from indication to implementation. Ann Surg. 2018;268:11–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002524 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ban D, Tanabe M, Ito H, Otsuka Y, Nitta H, Abe Y, et al. A novel difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection. J Hepato-Bil Pancreat Sci. 2014;21:745–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.166 . - DOI
-
- Wakabayashi G. What has changed after the Morioka consensus conference 2014 on laparoscopic liver resection? Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr What has changed after the Morioka consensus conference 2014 on laparoscopic liver resection. 2016;5:281–9. https://doi.org/10.21037/hbsn.2016.03.03
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources