Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug;19(4):820-835.
doi: 10.1007/s12072-025-10792-9. Epub 2025 Apr 9.

A robust diagnostic model for high-risk MASH: integrating clinical parameters and circulating biomarkers through a multi-omics approach

Affiliations

A robust diagnostic model for high-risk MASH: integrating clinical parameters and circulating biomarkers through a multi-omics approach

Jie Zhang et al. Hepatol Int. 2025 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is a critical health concern, with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) representing a severe subtype that poses significant risks. This study aims to develop a robust diagnostic model for high-risk MASH utilizing a multi-omics approach.

Methods: We initiated proteomic analysis to select differential proteins, followed by liver transcriptional profiling to localize these proteins. An intersection of differential proteins and liver-expressed genes facilitated the identification of candidate biomarkers. Subsequently, scRNA-seq data helped ascertain the subcellular localization of these biomarkers in kupffer cells. We then established two MASLD models to investigate the co-localization of F4/80 and the target proteins in Kupffer cells using immunofluorescence dual-labeling. Correlation analyses were performed using blood samples from a discovery cohort of 144 individuals with liver pathology to validate the relationships between candidate biomarkers and MASLD phenotypes. Using LASSO regression, we established the ABD-LTyG predictive model for high-risk MASH (NAS ≥ 4 + F ≥ 2) and validated its efficacy in an independent cohort of 171 individuals. Finally, we compared this model against three classic non-invasive liver fibrosis diagnostic methods.

Results: A proteo-transcriptomic comparison identified 58 consistent biomarkers in plasma and liver, with 25 closely associated with MASLD phenotype. Utilizing single-cell data and the HPA database, we delineated the localization of these biomarkers in liver cells, identifying TREM2, IL18BP, and LGALS3BP predominantly in the Kupffer cell subpopulation. Validation in animal models confirmed elevated expression and cellular localization of TREM2, IL18BP, and LGALS3BP in MASLD. To enhance diagnostic capability, we integrated clinical characteristics using LASSO regression to develop the ABD-LTyG model, comprising AST, BMI, total bilirubin (TB), vitamin D, TyG, and the biomarkers LGALS3BP and TREM2. This model demonstrated an AUC of 0.832 (95% CI 0.753-0.911) in the discovery cohort and 0.807 (95% CI 0.742-0.872) in the validation cohort for diagnosing high-risk MASH, outperforming traditional assessments such as FIB-4, NFS, and APRI.

Conclusion: The integration of circulating biomarkers and clinical parameters into the ABD-LTyG model offers a promising approach for diagnosing high-risk MASH. This study underscores the importance of multi-omics strategies in enhancing diagnostic accuracy and guiding clinical decision-making.

Keywords: Biomarker; Fibrosis; MASLD; Multi-omics strategies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The research protocol was reviewed and approved by the ethics committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (2023-SR-398). Informed consent was obtained from all participants involved in the study. Consent for publication: Not applicable.

Similar articles

References

    1. Targher G, Corey KE, Byrne CD, Roden M. The complex link between NAFLD and type 2 diabetes mellitus—mechanisms and treatments. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;18(9):599–612 - PubMed
    1. Chew NWS, Ng CH, Tan DJH, Kong G, Lin C, Chin YH, et al. The global burden of metabolic disease: data from 2000 to 2019. Cell Metab. 2023;35(3):414–28.e3 - PubMed
    1. Devarbhavi H, Asrani SK, Arab JP, Nartey YA, Pose E, Kamath PS. Global burden of liver disease: 2023 update. J Hepatol. 2023;79(2):516–537 - PubMed
    1. Bae SDW, George J, Qiao L. From MAFLD to hepatocellular carcinoma and everything in between. Chin Med J. 2022;135(5):547–556 - PubMed - PMC
    1. Govaere O, Hasoon M, Alexander L, Cockell S, Tiniakos D, Ekstedt M, et al. A proteo-transcriptomic map of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease signatures. Nat Metab. 2023;5(4):572–578 - PubMed - PMC

LinkOut - more resources