Heat: high-efficiency simulation for thermal ablation therapy
- PMID: 40205316
- DOI: 10.1007/s11548-025-03350-z
Heat: high-efficiency simulation for thermal ablation therapy
Abstract
Purpose: Percutaneous thermal ablation is increasingly popular but still suffers from a complex preoperative planning, especially with multiple needles. Existing planning methods either use theoretical ablation shapes for faster estimates or are computationally intensive when incorporating realistic thermal propagation. This paper introduces a multi-resolution approach that accelerates thermal propagation simulation, enabling users to adjust ablation parameters and see the results in interactive time.
Methods: For static needle positions, a high-resolution simulation based on GPU-accelerated implementation of the Pennes bioheat equation is used. During user interaction, intermediate frames display a lower-resolution estimation of the ablated volume. Two methods are compared, based on GPU-accelerated reimplementations of finite difference and lattice Boltzmann approaches. A parameter study was conducted to identify the optimal balance between speed and accuracy for the low- and high-resolution frames. The chosen parameters are finally tested in multi-needle scenarios to validate the interactive capability in this context.
Results: Tested with percutaneous radiofrequency data, our multi-resolution method significantly reduces computation time while maintaining good accuracy compared to the reference simulation. For high-resolution frames, we can reach up to 5.8 fps, while for intermediate low-resolution frames we can reach a frame rate of 32 fps with less than 20% loss of accuracy.
Conclusion: This multi-resolution approach allows for smooth interaction with multiple needles, with instant visualization of the predicted ablation volume, in the context of percutaneous radiofrequency treatments. It could also be applied to automated planning, reducing the time required for iterative adjustments.
Keywords: Percutaneous therapy; Planning; Simulation; Thermal ablation.
© 2025. CARS.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare. Ethics approval: This research study was conducted retrospectively from anonymized data, in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants.
References
-
- European Association for the Study of the Liver (2019) EASL. J Hepatol 69(1):182-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2019.01.020
-
- Anwanwan D, Singh SK, Singh S, Saikam V, Singh R (2020) Challenges in liver cancer and possible treatment approaches. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer 1873(1):188314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbcan.2019.188314 ,
-
- Audigier C, Mansi T, Delingette H, Rapaka S, Mihalef V, Carnegie D, Boctor E, Choti M, Kamen A, Ayache N, Comaniciu D (2015) Efficient lattice boltzmann solver for patient-specific radiofrequency ablation of hepatic tumors. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 34(7):1576–1589. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2015.2406575 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Baumgartner C, Hasgall P, Di Gennaro F, Neufeld E, Lloyd B, Gosselin M, Payne D, Klingenböck A, Kuster N (2024) IT’IS database for thermal and electromagnetic parameters of biological tissues, version 4.2. Tech. rep., IT’IS Foundation, https://doi.org/10.13099/VIP21000-04-2 , https://itis.swiss/virtual-population/tissue-properties/downloads/database-v4-2/
-
- Berjano EJ (2006) Theoretical modeling for radiofrequency ablation: state-of-the-art and challenges for the future. Biomed Eng Online 5(1):24. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-5-24 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous