The impacts of policies controlling the spatial availability of take-away alcohol on consumption and harms: A systematic narrative review
- PMID: 40205708
- DOI: 10.1111/add.70070
The impacts of policies controlling the spatial availability of take-away alcohol on consumption and harms: A systematic narrative review
Abstract
Aim: To systematically review the evidence on the impacts of policies regulating the spatial availability of off-premises alcohol on consumption and harms.
Methods: Narrative review that examined peer-reviewed studies published from 2016 to 2024 on policy changes affecting the spatial availability of off-premises alcohol. Outcomes of interest were alcohol consumption, alcohol-related harms and mortality.
Results: The review identified 20 observational studies, primarily natural experiments, examining four policy types: malt liquor restrictions, sales expansion to retail outlets, privatization and changes to allowable alcohol content. Across studies, there was a suggestion that allowing alcohol sales in gas station convenience stores was associated with increased consumption and harms, whereas expanding to grocery stores was not. There was no clear evidence that restricting malt liquor reduces crime. Similarly, privatization was not associated with crime or health outcomes, though it was accompanied by price increases. Increases in allowable alcohol content were not associated with higher consumption, but decreases were associated with fewer alcohol-related emergency visits and hospitalizations.
Conclusions: The impact of policy changes in spatial alcohol availability depends on the policy details and retail outlet types. To mitigate public health impacts, policymakers should consider comprehensive alcohol control measures, such as regulating convenience store sales and accompanying grocery store expansions with minimum unit pricing, taxation and marketing restrictions. High-quality natural experiments with pre-post designs, control groups and confounder adjustments are needed to better understand how these policies impact both the general population and high-risk subgroups.
Keywords: alcohol; alcohol availability; alcohol control policy; alcohol‐related harms; public health; spatial availability.
© 2025 The Author(s). Addiction published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society for the Study of Addiction.
Similar articles
-
Modelling the impacts of volumetric and minimum unit pricing for alcohol on social harms in Australia.Int J Drug Policy. 2024 Jul;129:104502. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104502. Epub 2024 Jun 28. Int J Drug Policy. 2024. PMID: 38943908
-
How many alcohol-attributable deaths and hospital admissions could be prevented by alternative pricing and taxation policies? Modelling impacts on alcohol consumption, revenues and related harms in Canada.Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2020 Jun;40(5-6):153-164. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.40.5/6.04. Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2020. PMID: 32529975 Free PMC article.
-
Estimating the public health impact of disbanding a government alcohol monopoly: application of new methods to the case of Sweden.BMC Public Health. 2018 Dec 22;18(1):1400. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6312-x. BMC Public Health. 2018. PMID: 30577827 Free PMC article.
-
A historical overview of legislated alcohol policy in the Northern Territory of Australia: 1979-2021.BMC Public Health. 2021 Oct 23;21(1):1921. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11957-5. BMC Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34686162 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Environmental interventions to reduce the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and their effects on health.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 12;6(6):CD012292. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012292.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 31194900 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Griswold MG, Fullman N, Hawley C, Arian N, Zimsen SR, Tymeson HD, et al. Alcohol use and burden for 195 countries and territories, 1990‐2016: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. Lancet. 2018;392(10152):1015–1035. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31310-2
-
- Bagnardi V, Rota M, Botteri E, Tramacere I, Islami F, Fedirko V, et al. Alcohol consumption and site‐specific cancer risk: a comprehensive dose‐response meta‐analysis. Br J Cancer. 2015;112(3):580–593. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.579
-
- World Health Organization. Global Health Status Report on Alcohol and Health 2018.; 2018.
-
- Navarro HJ, Doran CM, Shakeshaft AP. Measuring costs of alcohol harm to others: a review of the literature. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011;114(2‐3):87–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DRUGALCDEP.2010.11.009
-
- Rehm J, Mathers C, Popova S, Thavorncharoensap M, Teerawattananon Y, Patra J. Alcohol and Global Health 1 global burden of disease and injury and economic cost attributable to alcohol use and alcohol‐use disorders. Lancet. 2009;373:2223. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60746-7
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources