Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jun 8;2(3):361-365.
doi: 10.1016/j.mcpdig.2024.05.023. eCollection 2024 Sep.

Future of Evidence Synthesis: Automated, Living, and Interactive Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses

Irbaz Bin Riaz  1   2 , Syed Arsalan Ahmed Naqvi  1   2 , Bashar Hasan  1   3 , Mohammad Hassan Murad  1   3
Affiliations
Review

Future of Evidence Synthesis: Automated, Living, and Interactive Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses

Irbaz Bin Riaz et al. Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no competing interests.

Figures

Figure
Figure
Proposed framework for human-artificial intelligence collaboration: living interactive evidence synthesis framework. EHR, electronic health record; LLM, large language model; NVL, novel variant language.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Beller E.M., Chen J.K., Wang U.L., Glasziou P.P. Are systematic reviews up-to-date at the time of publication? Syst Rev. 2013;2:36. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-36. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marshall I.J., Wallace B.C. Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis. Syst Rev. 2019;8(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1074-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang S., Scells H., Koopman B., Potthast M., Zuccon G. Proceedings of the Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval in the Asia Pacific Region. 2023. Generating natural language queries for more effective systematic review screening prioritisation; pp. 73–83. - DOI
    1. Guimarães N.S., Joviano-Santos J.V., Reis M.G., Chaves R.R.M., Observatory of Epidemiology, Nutrition Health Research (OPENS) Development of search strategies for systematic reviews in health using ChatGPT: a critical analysis. J Transl Med. 2024;22(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12967-023-04371-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chai K.E.K., Lines R.L.J., Gucciardi D.F., Ng L. Research Screener: a machine learning tool to semi-automate abstract screening for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2021;10(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01635-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources