Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 9;12(4):241550.
doi: 10.1098/rsos.241550. eCollection 2025 Apr.

How do people perceive listeners?

Affiliations

How do people perceive listeners?

Guy Itzchakov et al. R Soc Open Sci. .

Abstract

Listening is essential in shaping social interactions, relationships and communication. While listening research has generated significant insights on how speakers benefit from good listening, one fundamental question has been largely overlooked: how do people perceive listeners? This gap is crucial for understanding how perceptions of listeners impact relational dynamics. In three studies (two preregistered; total N = 1509), we assessed the attributes and behaviours associated with good and bad listeners, and whether the favourability of these attributes and behaviours impact downstream consequences. In Study 1, participants identified an acquaintance they judged as a good or bad listener. Good listeners were rated higher in positive listening attributes and behaviours, which mediated their perceived warmth, competence and values. Study 2 replicated this using a reverse correlation technique: one sample generated faces of a good or bad listener, which were then evaluated by a second, naïve sample. Consistent with Study 1, good listener faces were rated higher in positive listening attributes and behaviours, mediating perceptions of warmth, competence, humility and values. Study 3 extended Study 2 by showing that the effects were not due to a general positivity bias, demonstrating the significant interpersonal consequences of being perceived as a good or bad listener.

Keywords: listeners; reverse correlation; social perception.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We declare we have no competing interests.

Figures

Proposed moderated mediation model.
Figure 1.
Proposed moderated mediation model.
Word clouds for good (2A) and bad (2B) listener attributes.
Figure 2.
Word clouds for good (A) and bad (B) listener attributes.
Word clouds for good (3A) and bad (3B) listener behaviours.
Figure 3.
Word clouds for good (A) and bad (B) listener behaviours.
Average classification images of good and bad listeners.
Figure 4.
Average classification images of good and bad listeners.
Good listener, bad listener, narcissist, and non-narcissist faces.
Figure 5.
Good listener, bad listener, narcissist and non-narcissist faces.

Similar articles

References

    1. Hargie O. 2021. Skilled interpersonal communication: research, theory and practice. Abingdon, UK: Routledge. (10.4324/9781003182269) - DOI
    1. Itzchakov G, Kluger AN, Castro DR. 2017. I am aware of my inconsistencies but can tolerate them. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 43, 105–120. (10.1177/0146167216675339) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kriz TD, Jolly PM, Shoss MK. 2021. Coping with organizational layoffs: managers’ increased active listening reduces job insecurity via perceived situational control. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 26, 448–458. (10.1037/ocp0000295) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Itzchakov G, Weinstein N, Saluk D, Amar M. 2023. Connection heals wounds: feeling listened to reduces speakers’ loneliness following a social rejection disclosure. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 49, 1273–1294. (10.1177/01461672221100369) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Itzchakov G, Weinstein N, Leary M, Saluk D, Amar M. 2024. Listening to understand: the role of high-quality listening on speakers’ attitude depolarization during disagreements. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 126, 213–239. (10.1037/pspa0000366) - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources