Comparing the Sensitivity and Specificity of Computed Tomography and Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Acute Cholecystitis in a Rural Setting
- PMID: 40206917
- PMCID: PMC11979442
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.80316
Comparing the Sensitivity and Specificity of Computed Tomography and Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Acute Cholecystitis in a Rural Setting
Abstract
Background Acute cholecystitis (AC) is a common inflammatory disease of the gallbladder, primarily caused by gallstones or sludge blockage. Early diagnosis and treatment are crucial for reducing morbidity and mortality. Ultrasound (US) and computed tomography (CT) are commonly used imaging methods, with US being considered the gold standard. However, recent studies have shown that CT has higher sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing AC in large hospital settings. Objective This study aims to determine the sensitivity and specificity of US and CT for AC in a community hospital and to assess the sensitivity and specificity of specific signs seen on US and CT for AC. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted, including patients who underwent US of the right upper quadrant (RUQ) and/or CT of the abdomen and pelvis, followed by pathological evaluation of the gallbladder after surgical removal between May 1, 2019, and April 30, 2023. Data collected included patient demographics, laboratory values, symptoms, US findings, CT findings, and pathology results. Imaging signs were recorded based on radiology reports and were considered positive if any sign was present. A true positive for CT and US was recorded if imaging was positive for AC and the pathological report confirmed AC. Results A total of 187 patients who underwent cholecystectomy for AC, with a median age of 60.6 years, were included in the final analysis. Abdominal pain was the most common presenting symptom (176/187, 94.1%), followed by nausea (114/187, 61.0%) and vomiting (75/187, 40.1%). White blood cell (WBC) counts were elevated in all groups, with median levels of 11.3 (US only), 15.8 (CT only), and 12.3 (both US and CT) (p<0.001). Most patients (169/187, 90.4%) received an RUQ US, and 123/187 (65.8%) underwent a CT scan prior to surgery. The sensitivity of US and CT was found to be similar (98.6% and 93.4%, respectively) when following a one-sign criterion. US was more sensitive than CT (80.9% and 70.0%, respectively) when a two-sign criterion was used. In a direct comparison between CT and US, US was more sensitive in detecting cholelithiasis and a thickened gallbladder wall (95.9% and 92.3%, respectively), while CT was more sensitive in detecting pericholecystic fluid and gallbladder distension (83.6% and 95.7%, respectively). Conclusion In a community emergency department, US had higher sensitivity than CT for detecting AC when a two-sign criterion was used. Based on these results, US should continue to be the first-line imaging modality in patients suspected of having AC.
Keywords: cholecystitis; computed tomography; sensitivity; specificity; ultrasound.
Copyright © 2025, Gerbasi et al.
Conflict of interest statement
Human subjects: Consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Kingman Regional Medical Center issued approval KRMC0306. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: Lucas Gerbasi was the recipient of the Keneth A. Suarez fellowship scholarship and a $6,000 internal scholarship through Midwestern University for Osteopathic Medical Students proposing an original research project. Financial relationships: Lucas Gerbasi declare(s) personal fees from Midwestern University. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
References
-
- Acute cholecystitis. Indar AA, Beckingham IJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.325.7365.639. BMJ. 2002;325:639–643. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Nationwide trends of hospital admissions for acute cholecystitis in the United States. Wadhwa V, Jobanputra Y, Garg SK, Patwardhan S, Mehta D, Sanaka MR. https://doi.org/10.1093/gastro/gow015. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2017;5:36–42. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Pathophysiology and pathology of acute cholecystitis: a secondary publication of the Japanese version from 1992. Adachi T, Eguchi S, Muto Y. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.912. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2022;29:212–216. - PubMed
-
- Acute cholecystitis-optimal timing for early cholecystectomy: a French nationwide study. Polo M, Duclos A, Polazzi S, et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-015-2909-x. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19:2003–2010. - PubMed
-
- Acute cholecystitis: early versus delayed cholecystectomy, a multicenter randomized trial (ACDC study, NCT00447304) Gutt CN, Encke J, Köninger J, et al. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e3182a1599b. Ann Surg. 2013;258:385–393. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous