Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasties: Why Do They Fail?
- PMID: 40207181
- PMCID: PMC11978342
- DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2025.101662
Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasties: Why Do They Fail?
Abstract
Background: Metal sensitivity reaction is a major concern in painful failed metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip arthroplasty (THA), but it may not be the dominant failure mode. We investigated revised MoM THAs for failure etiologies, operative indications, and clinical outcomes.
Methods: Ninety consecutive revised MoM THAs were reviewed. Preoperative evaluation included inflammatory markers, metal ion levels, radiographs, metal artifact reduction sequence magnetic resonance imaging, synovial fluid analysis, and operative histopathology. Outcome measures included advanced imaging and laboratory findings, revision etiology, and clinical outcomes.
Results: Metal sensitivity reactions (MSRs) accounted for 36% of MoM failures, with 64% of MoM THA being revised for non-MSR-related etiologies. Failure etiologies not related to MoM bearing articulation included prosthetic joint infection (14%), aseptic loosening (13%), isolated abductor failure (7%), periprosthetic fracture (3%), recurrent dislocation (3%), symptomatic heterotopic ossification (3%), mechanical failure (1%), and angiosarcoma (1%). Additionally, 18% of patients had painful MoM THA with no identifiable failure etiology; of these patients, 69% had continued pain following revision. Patients with large periarticular fluid collections had an odds ratio of 19.2 (P =< 0.0001) of having MSR. Cobalt (Co) levels were statistically higher in patients with MSR compared to non-MSR-related failures (P = .034). Chromium (Cr) ion levels and the Co/Cr ratio did not predict MSR.
Conclusions: The majority of revised MoM THAs did not have MSR. Large periarticular fluid collections and elevated Co levels were highly predictive of MSR. Painful MoM THA without an identifiable failure etiology resulted in a high incidence of persistent pain following revision.
Keywords: Hip arthroplasty; Metal hypersensitivity; Metal-on-metal.
© 2025 The Authors.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Preoperative Risk Factors Associated With Poor Outcomes of Revision Surgery for "Pseudotumors" in Patients With Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty.J Arthroplasty. 2016 Dec;31(12):2835-2842. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.05.034. Epub 2016 May 27. J Arthroplasty. 2016. PMID: 27387480
-
Revisions of Modular Metal-on-metal THA Have a High Risk of Early Complications.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Feb;477(2):344-350. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000363. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019. PMID: 30794222 Free PMC article.
-
What Is the Risk of THA Revision for ARMD in Patients with Non-metal-on-metal Bearings? A Study from the Australian National Joint Replacement Registry.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Jun;478(6):1244-1253. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001277. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020. PMID: 32345846 Free PMC article.
-
Outcomes of different bearings in total hip arthroplasty - implant survival, revision causes, and patient-reported outcome.Dan Med J. 2017 Mar;64(3):B5350. Dan Med J. 2017. PMID: 28260601 Review.
-
Understanding outcomes and toxicological aspects of second generation metal-on-metal hip implants: a state-of-the-art review.Crit Rev Toxicol. 2018 Nov;48(10):853-901. doi: 10.1080/10408444.2018.1563048. Epub 2019 Mar 26. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2018. PMID: 30912993 Review.
References
-
- Girard J., Bocquet D., Autissier G., Fouilleron N., Fron D., Migaud H. Metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty in patients thirty years of age or younger. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:2419–2426. - PubMed
-
- Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry - Annual Report. AOA; Adelaide, Australia: 2011.
-
- Brown G.C., Lockshin M.D., Salvati E.A., Bullough P.G. Sensitivity to metal as a possible cause of sterile loosening after cobalt-chromium total hip-replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977;59:164–168. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources