Progressive Ototoxicity of Baby Shampoo As An Antifog Agent: An Experimental Study
- PMID: 40208046
- PMCID: PMC12001520
- DOI: 10.5152/iao.2025.241526
Progressive Ototoxicity of Baby Shampoo As An Antifog Agent: An Experimental Study
Abstract
Background: Endoscopes play an important role in otologic surgery. Baby shampoos, known for their hypoallergenic, anti-irritant, and antifogging properties, are increasingly being used. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and ototoxic effects of baby shampoo in an animal model using both electrophysiological and histological methods.
Methods: Twenty-eight male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into 4 groups: 7 control (group 1), 7 saline (group 2), 7 isopropyl alcohol (70%) + chlorhexidine (2%) antiseptic (group 3), and 7 baby shampoo (group 4). Baseline hearing was assessed by auditory brainstem response (ABR). All groups except the control received 3 doses of their respective substances by intratympanic injection. Auditory brainstem response measurements were performed on day 7 and day 21, after which the temporal bones were dissected. Histological evaluation of the cochlea and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) immunoreactivity studies were performed.
Results: Baseline hearing thresholds were similar and within normal limits. On days 7 and 21, hearing thresholds were significantly impaired at all frequencies in the experimental groups. In particular, groups 3 and 4 had higher thresholds than the other groups. Baby shampoo caused significant damage to outer hair cells and sustentacular cells and decreased VEGF immunoreactivity in the stria vascularis, spiral ligament, and organ of Corti.
Conclusion: Baby shampoo was found to progressively impair hearing over time, indicating its potential to cause long-term ototoxicity.
Keywords: Ototoxicity; Sprague–Dawley rat; auditory brainstem response; cochlea; intratympanic injection.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures



Similar articles
-
Does Hypochlorous Acid Cause Ototoxicity? An Experimental Study.Otol Neurotol. 2022 Dec 1;43(10):e1187-e1193. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003734. Otol Neurotol. 2022. PMID: 36351230
-
The ototoxicity of 3,3'-iminodipropionitrile: functional and morphological evidence of cochlear damage.Hear Res. 1994 Nov;80(2):129-40. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(94)90104-x. Hear Res. 1994. PMID: 7896571
-
Do Disinfectants Induce Ototoxicity and Cause Structural Damage to the Inner Ear?Laryngoscope. 2025 Jun;135(6):2154-2163. doi: 10.1002/lary.32044. Epub 2025 Feb 11. Laryngoscope. 2025. PMID: 39932143
-
Cisplatin-induced ototoxicity: the effect of pigmentation and inhibitory agents.Laryngoscope. 1993 Apr;103(4 Pt 2):1-52. Laryngoscope. 1993. PMID: 8464301 Review.
-
Ototoxicity: a high risk to auditory function that needs to be monitored in drug development.Front Mol Neurosci. 2024 May 2;17:1379743. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2024.1379743. eCollection 2024. Front Mol Neurosci. 2024. PMID: 38756707 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Chainansamit S, Piromchai P, Anantpinijwatna I, Kasemsiri P, Thanaviratananich S. Baby Shampoo versus Commercial Anti-fogging Solution to Prevent Fogging during Nasal Endoscopy: a Randomized Double-Blinded, Matched-Pair, Equivalent Trial. J Med Assoc Thai. 2015;98(suppl 7):S128 S131. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials