Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2025 Aug;62(2):551-560.
doi: 10.1002/jmri.29743. Epub 2025 Apr 10.

Quantification of the Proton Density Fat Fraction and Iron Content: A Comparative Study Between 3.0 T and 5.0 T MRI

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Quantification of the Proton Density Fat Fraction and Iron Content: A Comparative Study Between 3.0 T and 5.0 T MRI

Yali Li et al. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2025 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and R2* are noninvasive MRI biomarkers for quantifying fat and iron in abdominal organs. While 3.0 T MRI is widely used clinically, 5.0 T may offer improved accuracy and reliability. With the increasing availability of 5.0 T, assessing its feasibility and utility for quantifying PDFF and R2* in abdominal organs is needed.

Purpose: To determine the agreement of the PDFF and R2* in the liver, pancreas, kidney, and paraspinal muscle at 2 different field strengths.

Study type: Prospective.

Population: A total of 127 participants, including 60 healthy volunteers and 67 with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (100 women and 27 men, 52 ± 9 years old).

Field strength/sequence: 3.0 T and 5.0 T; Chemical shift-encoded multi-echo gradient echo sequence.

Assessment: PDFF and R2* values in the liver, pancreas, kidney, and paraspinal muscle were measured by three observers to evaluate the interobserver and interfield agreement using two 3.0 T scanners (scanner 1 and scanner 2) and one 5.0 T scanner.

Statistical tests: Linear regression, Bland-Altman analyses, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). The p-value < 0.05 indicated statistically significant.

Results: PDFF and R2* at 5.0 T were strongly correlated with those at two 3.0 T scanners for all organs (R 2 = 0.905-0.998 for PDFF; 0.831-0.991 for R2*), indicating high interfield ICCs (0.892-0.993 for PDFF; 0.910-0.981 for R2*). Comparisons between 5.0 T and two 3.0 T scanners showed good interfield agreement for PDFF (mean bias, -0.57% to 0.03%) while a higher bias for R2* (mean bias, -16.53 to -2.64 s-1, 95% LoA, -34.28 to 1.21 s-1) at 5.0 T compared to the comparison between 3T scanners.

Data conclusion: 5.0 T revealed high interfield agreement between the PDFF and R2* with 3.0 T, which could provide reliable quantification of fat and iron contents in abdominal organs.

Evidence level: 2.

Technical efficacy: Stage 2.

Keywords: 5.0 T MRI; R2* quantification; high‐field MRI; proton density fat fraction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. J. C. Bleeker, G. Visser, F. A. Wijburg, et al., “Severe Fat Accumulation in Multiple Organs in Pediatric Autopsies: An Uncommon but Significant Finding,” Pediatric and Developmental Pathology 20, no. 4 (2017): 269–276.
    1. P. Dongiovanni, A. L. Fracanzani, S. Fargion, and L. Valenti, “Iron in Fatty Liver and in the Metabolic Syndrome: A Promising Therapeutic Target,” Journal of Hepatology 55, no. 4 (2011): 920–932.
    1. G. C. Farrell and C. Z. Larter, “Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: From Steatosis to Cirrhosis,” Hepatology 43, no. 2 Suppl 1 (2006): S99–S112.
    1. F. Negro and A. J. Sanyal, “Hepatitis C Virus, Steatosis and Lipid Abnormalities: Clinical and Pathogenic Data,” Liver International 29, no. Suppl 2 (2009): 26–37.
    1. V. W. Setiawan, D. O. Stram, J. Porcel, et al., “Prevalence of Chronic Liver Disease and Cirrhosis by Underlying Cause in Understudied Ethnic Groups: The Multiethnic Cohort,” Hepatology 64, no. 6 (2016): 1969–1977.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources