Quantification of the Proton Density Fat Fraction and Iron Content: A Comparative Study Between 3.0 T and 5.0 T MRI
- PMID: 40208110
- DOI: 10.1002/jmri.29743
Quantification of the Proton Density Fat Fraction and Iron Content: A Comparative Study Between 3.0 T and 5.0 T MRI
Abstract
Background: Proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and R2* are noninvasive MRI biomarkers for quantifying fat and iron in abdominal organs. While 3.0 T MRI is widely used clinically, 5.0 T may offer improved accuracy and reliability. With the increasing availability of 5.0 T, assessing its feasibility and utility for quantifying PDFF and R2* in abdominal organs is needed.
Purpose: To determine the agreement of the PDFF and R2* in the liver, pancreas, kidney, and paraspinal muscle at 2 different field strengths.
Study type: Prospective.
Population: A total of 127 participants, including 60 healthy volunteers and 67 with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (100 women and 27 men, 52 ± 9 years old).
Field strength/sequence: 3.0 T and 5.0 T; Chemical shift-encoded multi-echo gradient echo sequence.
Assessment: PDFF and R2* values in the liver, pancreas, kidney, and paraspinal muscle were measured by three observers to evaluate the interobserver and interfield agreement using two 3.0 T scanners (scanner 1 and scanner 2) and one 5.0 T scanner.
Statistical tests: Linear regression, Bland-Altman analyses, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). The p-value < 0.05 indicated statistically significant.
Results: PDFF and R2* at 5.0 T were strongly correlated with those at two 3.0 T scanners for all organs (R 2 = 0.905-0.998 for PDFF; 0.831-0.991 for R2*), indicating high interfield ICCs (0.892-0.993 for PDFF; 0.910-0.981 for R2*). Comparisons between 5.0 T and two 3.0 T scanners showed good interfield agreement for PDFF (mean bias, -0.57% to 0.03%) while a higher bias for R2* (mean bias, -16.53 to -2.64 s-1, 95% LoA, -34.28 to 1.21 s-1) at 5.0 T compared to the comparison between 3T scanners.
Data conclusion: 5.0 T revealed high interfield agreement between the PDFF and R2* with 3.0 T, which could provide reliable quantification of fat and iron contents in abdominal organs.
Evidence level: 2.
Technical efficacy: Stage 2.
Keywords: 5.0 T MRI; R2* quantification; high‐field MRI; proton density fat fraction.
© 2025 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
Similar articles
-
Multi-Center, Multi-Vendor Validation of Simultaneous MRI-Based Proton Density Fat Fraction and R2* Mapping Using a Combined Proton Density Fat Fraction-R2* Phantom.J Magn Reson Imaging. 2025 Sep;62(3):800-811. doi: 10.1002/jmri.29775. Epub 2025 Apr 18. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2025. PMID: 40251801 Free PMC article.
-
Reference Values for Water-Specific T1, Intermuscular and Intramuscular Fat Content in Skeletal Muscle at 2.89 T.J Magn Reson Imaging. 2025 Jul;62(1):146-159. doi: 10.1002/jmri.29718. Epub 2025 Jan 24. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2025. PMID: 39854265 Free PMC article.
-
Motion-Insensitive Flip Angle Modulated Liver Proton Density Fat-Fraction and R2* Mapping During Free-Breathing MRI in a Clinical Setting.J Magn Reson Imaging. 2025 Jul 12. doi: 10.1002/jmri.70033. Online ahead of print. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2025. PMID: 40650546
-
Association of proton-density fat fraction with osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Osteoporos Int. 2024 Dec;35(12):2077-2086. doi: 10.1007/s00198-024-07220-3. Epub 2024 Aug 12. Osteoporos Int. 2024. PMID: 39129009
-
Free-breathing MRI techniques for fat and R2* quantification in the liver.MAGMA. 2024 Aug;37(4):583-602. doi: 10.1007/s10334-024-01187-2. Epub 2024 Jul 23. MAGMA. 2024. PMID: 39039272 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- J. C. Bleeker, G. Visser, F. A. Wijburg, et al., “Severe Fat Accumulation in Multiple Organs in Pediatric Autopsies: An Uncommon but Significant Finding,” Pediatric and Developmental Pathology 20, no. 4 (2017): 269–276.
-
- P. Dongiovanni, A. L. Fracanzani, S. Fargion, and L. Valenti, “Iron in Fatty Liver and in the Metabolic Syndrome: A Promising Therapeutic Target,” Journal of Hepatology 55, no. 4 (2011): 920–932.
-
- G. C. Farrell and C. Z. Larter, “Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: From Steatosis to Cirrhosis,” Hepatology 43, no. 2 Suppl 1 (2006): S99–S112.
-
- F. Negro and A. J. Sanyal, “Hepatitis C Virus, Steatosis and Lipid Abnormalities: Clinical and Pathogenic Data,” Liver International 29, no. Suppl 2 (2009): 26–37.
-
- V. W. Setiawan, D. O. Stram, J. Porcel, et al., “Prevalence of Chronic Liver Disease and Cirrhosis by Underlying Cause in Understudied Ethnic Groups: The Multiethnic Cohort,” Hepatology 64, no. 6 (2016): 1969–1977.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical