Review on MXenes-Based Electrocatalysts for High-Energy-Density Lithium-Sulfur Batteries
- PMID: 40208556
- PMCID: PMC11985747
- DOI: 10.1007/s40820-025-01726-z
Review on MXenes-Based Electrocatalysts for High-Energy-Density Lithium-Sulfur Batteries
Abstract
Lithium-sulfur batteries (LSBs) hold significant promise as advanced energy storage systems due to their high energy density, low cost, and environmental advantages. However, despite recent advancements, their practical energy density still falls short of the levels required for commercial viability. The energy density is critically dependent on both sulfur loading and the amount of electrolyte used. High-sulfur loading coupled with lean electrolyte conditions presents several challenges, including the insulating nature of sulfur and Li2S, insufficient electrolyte absorption, degradation of the cathode structure, severe lithium polysulfide shuttling, slow redox reaction kinetics, and instability of the Li metal anode. MXenes-based materials, with their metallic conductivity, large polar surfaces, and abundant active sites, have been identified as promising electrocatalysts to improve the redox reactions in LSBs. This review focuses on the significance and challenges associated with high-sulfur loading and lean electrolytes in LSBs, highlighting recent advancements in MXenes-based electrocatalysts aimed at optimizing sulfur cathodes and lithium anodes. It provides a comprehensive discussion on MXenes as both active materials and substrates in LSBs, with the goal of enhancing understanding of the regulatory mechanisms that govern sulfur conversion reactions and lithium plating/stripping behavior. Finally, the review explores future opportunities for MXenes-based electrocatalysts, paving the way for the practical application of LSBs.
Keywords: High-sulfur loading; Lean electrolyte; Lithium–sulfur batteries; MXenes; Shuttle effect.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no interest conflict. They have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures









References
-
- M. Armand, J.-M. Tarascon, Building better batteries. Nature 451(7179), 652–657 (2008). 10.1038/451652a - PubMed
-
- L. Wang, Y. Li, Y. Ai, E. Fan, F. Zhang et al., Tracking heterogeneous interface charge reverse separation in SrTiO3/NiO/NiS nanofibers with in situ irradiation XPS. Adv. Funct. Mater. 33(44), 2306466 (2023). 10.1002/adfm.202306466
-
- C. Xia, C.Y. Kwok, L.F. Nazar, A high-energy-density lithium–oxygen battery based on a reversible four-electron conversion to lithium oxide. Science 361(6404), 777–781 (2018). 10.1126/science.aas9343 - PubMed
-
- M. Winter, R.J. Brodd, What are batteries, fuel cells, and supercapacitors? Chem. Rev. 104(10), 4245–4269 (2004). 10.1021/cr020730k - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources