Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul;70(1):e73-e80.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.04.001. Epub 2025 Apr 9.

Use of the consideRATE and integRATE Measures to Assess Care Quality in Inpatient Palliative Care

Meredith A MacMartin  1 , Joseph P Nano  2 , Elodie Richard  3 , Melissa Garland  4 , Kristen Johnson  4 , Kathryn Kirkland  2 , Barbara Mathewson  4 , Mary Thibideau  4 , Catherine H Saunders  2
Affiliations

Use of the consideRATE and integRATE Measures to Assess Care Quality in Inpatient Palliative Care

Meredith A MacMartin et al. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2025 Jul.

Abstract

Context: Despite recognition of the importance of measuring the quality of palliative care, there are significant gaps in information about how to do so in real-world settings, particularly for patient-reported experience measures (PREMs).

Objectives: To institute a routine process of quality measurement using PREMs to support quality improvement and service recovery, in a single center inpatient palliative care unit in the United States.

Methods: Volunteers with prior healthcare experience administered two PREMs: consideRATE (a measure of patient serious illness experience) and integRATE (a measure of healthcare team integration). We calculated both item and overall mean scores, and top-box scores to mitigate potential ceiling effects. Negative or critical complaints were promptly brought to the unit nurse manager for real-time service recovery.

Results: The overall mean consideRATE score was 3.88 (highest score possible of 4), and the overall mean integRATE score was 3.91 (highest score possible of 4). Top-box scores were 70% for consideRATE, and 75% for integRATE. The majority of the feedback given was positive. Opportunities for improvement of the unit environment, communication with patients and families, and the nursing and medical care, were identified. In some cases, critical feedback was acted on in real time to allow for service recovery.

Conclusion: Using consideRATE and integRATE in routine care is feasible, allows for effective identification of patient and family concerns about care, and should be considered for other palliative care settings.

Keywords: Patient experience; palliative care unit; quality improvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Walling AM, Ast K, Harrison JM, et al. Patient-Reported Quality Measures for Palliative Care: The Time is now. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023;65(2):87–100. - PubMed
    1. Dy SM, Kiley KB, Ast K, et al. Measuring what matters: top-ranked quality indicators for hospice and palliative care from the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine and Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015;49(4):773–781. - PubMed
    1. Palliative Care Measures. Accessed December 9, 2024. https://www.jointcommission.orghttps://www.jointcommission.org/measureme...
    1. Hanson LC, Scheunemann LP, Zimmerman S, Rokoske FS, Schenck AP. The PEACE project review of clinical instruments for hospice and palliative care. J Palliat Med. 2010;13(10):1253–1260. - PubMed
    1. Nano JP, Stevens G, Elwyn G, et al. Using consideRATE to evaluate patient experience in a cancer center: Psychometric and healthcare assessments. medRxiv. Published online January 27, 2025:2025.01.24.25321099. doi: 10.1101/2025.01.24.25321099 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources