Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun;105(6):104171.
doi: 10.1016/j.labinv.2025.104171. Epub 2025 Apr 8.

Prognostic Value of PARP1 and PARP2 Copy Number Alterations in Prostate Cancer

Affiliations

Prognostic Value of PARP1 and PARP2 Copy Number Alterations in Prostate Cancer

Laura Segalés et al. Lab Invest. 2025 Jun.

Abstract

PARP1/2 have overlapping yet nonredundant biological functions in DNA repair and androgen receptor-transcriptional regulation. Studies on PARP alterations in human tumors have yielded conflicting results. In prostate cancer (PCa), PARP1/2 protein overexpression has been related to androgen deprivation therapy resistance, biochemical recurrence, and progression to metastases. PARP inhibitors have been approved for treating metastatic castration-resistant PCa with homologous recombination repair gene mutations. However, the significance of PARP1/2 genomic alterations is not fully studied. We aimed to analyze PARP1/2 alterations in PCa, assess their value as prognostic markers, and explore their relevance for potential therapeutic stratification. PARP1/2 copy number status was evaluated in 121 PCa primary tumors using real-time PCR. In 29 of them, a regional pelvic lymph node involvement was also analyzed. BRCA1/2 somatic mutations were analyzed in 24 PCa cases. Relationship with clinicopathological features, progression to metastases, and prostate-specific antigen recurrence was assessed. PARP1 loss and PARP2 gain were detected in 34.7% and 32.2% of primary tumors, respectively, with a high frequency of co-occurrence (P < .001). Both alterations were statistically associated with locally advanced disease at the time of diagnosis (P = .036; P = .006), metastatic dissemination (P = .014; P = .003), and other aggressive clinicopathological characteristics (such as the presence of Gleason pattern 5, high-grade, and high-stage). Cases with exclusive PARP2 gain had the shortest time to prostate-specific antigen recurrence, whereas double wt patients displayed the best outcome (P = .007). In 29 paired primary tumors and regional pelvic lymph node involvement, PARP1 loss showed strong concordance (P = .001), whereas PARP2 gain did not (P = .411). In conclusion, loss of PARP1 and gain of PARP2 show strong co-occurrence and are associated with clinicopathological characteristics of aggressiveness. PARP2 alterations appear to have a particularly significant impact on disease prognosis. Furthermore, these data suggest that the analysis of PARP1/2 copy number status could be useful in predicting PCa outcomes. Its role in therapy warrants further evaluation.

Keywords: PARP inhibitors; PARP1; PARP2; copy number; prostate cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources