Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 10;22(1):80.
doi: 10.1186/s12984-025-01616-w.

Is physical therapy recommended for people with parkinson's disease treated with subthalamic deep brain stimulation? a delphi consensus study

Affiliations

Is physical therapy recommended for people with parkinson's disease treated with subthalamic deep brain stimulation? a delphi consensus study

Matteo Guidetti et al. J Neuroeng Rehabil. .

Abstract

Background: Although deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS) induces motor benefits in people with Parkinson's disease (PwPD), its effect on motor axial symptoms (e.g., postural instability, trunk posture alterations) and gait impairments (e.g., freezing of gait) is still ambiguous. Physical therapy (PT) effectively complements pharmacological treatment to improve postural stability, gait performance, and other dopamine-resistant symptoms (e.g. freezing of gait) in the general population with PD. Despite the positive potential of combined PT and STN-DBS surgery, scientific results are still lacking. We therefore involved worldwide leading experts on DBS and motor rehabilitation in PwPD in a consensus Delphi panel to define the current level of PT recommendation following STN-DBS surgery.

Methods: After summarizing the few available findings through a systematic scoping review, we identified clinically and academically experienced DBS clinicians (n = 21) to discuss the challenges related to PT following STN-DBS. A 5-point Likert scale questionnaire was used and based on the results of the systematic review, thirty-nine questions were designed and submitted to the panel-half related to general considerations on PT following STN-DBS, and half related to PT treatments.

Results: Despite the low-to-moderate quality of data, the few available rehabilitation studies suggested that PT could improve dynamic and static balance, gait performance and posture in the population with PD receiving STN-DBS. Similarly, the panellists strongly agreed that PT might help improve motor symptoms and quality of life, and it may be prescribed to maximize the effects of stimulation. The experts agreed that physical therapists could be part of the multidisciplinary team taking care of the patients. Also, they agreed that conventional PT, but not massage or manual therapy, should be prescribed because of the specificity of STN-DBS implantation.

Conclusions: Although RCT evidence is lacking, upon Delphi panel, PT for PwPD receiving STN-DBS can be potentially useful to maximize clinical improvement. However, more research is needed, with RCTs and well-designed studies. The rehabilitation and DBS community should expand this area of research to create guidelines for PT following STN-DBS.

Keywords: DBS; Deep brain stimulation; Delphi consensus; Motor rehabilitation; Movement disorders; Neuromodulation; Parkinson’s disease; Physical therapy; Physiotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: A.F. has received payments as consultant and/or speaker from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Ceregate, Inbrain Neuroelectronics, Medtronic, Iota and has received research support from Boston Scientific, Medtronic; K.D.F. reports receiving research support and fellowship support from Medtronic and Boston Scientific and research support from Functional Neuromodulation; J.K.K. is a consultant to Medtronic, Boston Scientific, aleva and Inomed; A.A.K. is a consultant to Medtronic, Boston Scientific and Teva; A.M.L. is a consultant to Abbott, Boston Scientific, Insightec, Medtronic and Functional Neuromodulation (Scientific Director). EM has received an educational grant from Boston Scientific and honoraria from Medtronic and Newronika; M.S.O. serves as Medical Advisor in the Parkinson’s Foundation, and has received research grants from NIH, Parkinson’s Foundation, the Michael J. Fox Foundation, the Parkinson Alliance, Smallwood Foundation, the Bachmann-Strauss Foundation, the Tourette Syndrome Association, and the UF Foundation. M.S.O. 's research is supported by: R01 NS131342 NIH R01 NR014852, R01NS096008, UH3NS119844, U01NS119562. M.S.O. is PI of the NIH R25NS108939 Training Grant. M.S.O. has received royalties for publications with Hachette Book Group, Demos, Manson, Amazon, Smashwords, Books4Patients, Perseus, Robert Rose, Oxford and Cambridge (movement disorders books). M.S.O. is an associate editor for New England Journal of Medicine Journal Watch Neurology and JAMA Neurology. M.S.O. has participated in CME and educational activities (past 12–24 months) on movement disorders sponsored by WebMD/Medscape, RMEI Medical Education, American Academy of Neurology, Movement Disorders Society, Mediflix and by Vanderbilt University. The institution and not M.S.O. receives grants from industry. M.S.O. has participated as a site PI and/or co-I for several NIH, foundation, and industry sponsored trials over the years but has not received honoraria. Research projects at the University of Florida receive device and drug donations; A.S. received consulting fees from Abbott, Zambon, and Abbvie, and speaker honoraria from bsh medical communication, Abbott, Kyowa Kirin, Novartis, Abbvie, and Alexion, GE Healtcare. The institution of A.S., not A.S. personally, received funding by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, the Brunhilde Moll Foundation, and Abbott; L.T. received occasional payments as a consultant for Boston Scientific, L.T. received honoraria as a speaker on symposia sponsored by Boston Scientific, AbbVIE, Novartis, Neuraxpharm, Teva, the Movement Disorders Society und DIAPLAN. The institution of L.T., not L.T. personally, received funding by Boston Scientific, the German Research Foundation, the German Ministry of Education and Research, the Otto-Loewi-Foundation and the Deutsche Parkinson Vereinigung. Neither L.T. nor any member of his family holds stocks, stock options, patents or financial interests in any of the above-mentioned companies or their competitors. L.T. serves as the president of the German Neurological Society without any payment or any income; V.V.V. received occasional payments as a consultant or speaker on symposia from Boston Scientific and Medtronic. J.V. reports grants and personal fees from Medtronic, grants and personal fees from Boston Scientific, personal fees from Abbott outside the submitted work. J.V. was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG, Project-ID424778381, TRR 295)—J.V. received consulting and lecture fees from Boston Scientific, Medtronic and Newronika, research grants from the German Research Foundation, the German Ministry of Research and Education, Boston Scientific and Medtronic, lecture Honoraria from UCB, Zambon, Abbott; A.P. and S.M. are founders and shareholders of Newronika Spa, Italy; All the other authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Percentage of agreement for the 11 general considerations on physical therapy after subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation in patients with Parkinson’s disease (Statement 1–11) among the Delphi Panel members, as result of the second round. Statement 1, Statement 4 and Statement 11 reached a consensus, i.e., 89% of the responses fell within the response label “strongly agree”. PD = Parkinson’s disease; STN-DBS = subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation; S = statement
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Percentage of agreement for the 11 general considerations on physical therapy after subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation in patients with Parkinson’s disease (Statement 1–11) among the Delphi Panel members, as result of the third round. Statement 5, Statement 8, Statement 9 and Statement 10 reached a consensus, i.e., respectively, 88%, 94%, 88% and 88% of the responses fell in the response label “strongly agree”. PD = Parkinson’s disease; STN-DBS = subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation; S = statement
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Percentage of agreement for the 28 statements on physical therapy treatments after subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation in patients with Parkinson’s disease (Statement 12–39) among the Delphi Panel members, as result of the third round. Statement 12 and Statement 13 reached a consensus, i.e., for both, 81% of the responses fell in the response label “strongly agree”. Statement 17 reached a consensus, i.e., 81% of the responses fell in the response label “disagree”. PD = Parkinson’s disease; STN-DBS = subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation; S = statemen

Update of

References

    1. Limousin P, Foltynie T. Long-term outcomes of deep brain stimulation in Parkinson disease. Nat Rev Neurol. 2019;15(4):234–42. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Prasad AA, Wallén-Mackenzie Å. Architecture of the subthalamic nucleus. Commun Biol. 2024;7(1):1–14. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fasano A, Aquino CC, Krauss JK, Honey CR, Bloem BR. Axial disability and deep brain stimulation in patients with Parkinson disease. Nat Rev Neurol. 2015;11(2):98–110. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Krack P, Martinez-Fernandez R, del Alamo M, Obeso JA. Current applications and limitations of surgical treatments for movement disorders. Mov Disord. 2017;32(1):36–52. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rubenis J. A rehabilitational approach to the management of Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2007;13(SUPPL. 3):S495–7. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types