Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2025 Apr 8;47(3):cjaf014.
doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjaf014.

Comparative microscopic analysis of plastic dispersion from 3D-printed and thermoformed orthodontic aligners

Piero Antonio Zecca  1 , Marina Borgese  1 , Mario Raspanti  1 , Francesca Zara  2   3 , Rosamaria Fastuca  4 , Marco Serafin  5 , Alberto Caprioglio  2   3
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparative microscopic analysis of plastic dispersion from 3D-printed and thermoformed orthodontic aligners

Piero Antonio Zecca et al. Eur J Orthod. .

Abstract

Aim: To compare directly printed aligners (DPA) and thermoformed aligners (TFA), evaluating the potential release and dispersion of microplastic (MP) and nanoplastic (NP) particles under simulated oral conditions.

Materials and methods: DPA samples (Graphy Tera Harz TC-85-DAC resin) and TFA samples (Invisalign® SmartTrack) were subjected to rubs in an ultrapure water bath. The liquid was collected post-friction and analyzed for MPs and NPs using various techniques: optical microscopy (OM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and atomic force microscopy (AFM). Also, plastic residues were quantified by weighing after drying within a laminar flow hood. Microscopic image analyses comprised the quantification of the average size of MPs and NPs, their concentration by TEM, and the roughness analysis by AFM.

Results: The masses of MPs and NPs separated after rubbing were 0.001 g/200 µl and 0.004 g/200 µl for TFA and DPA samples, respectively. TEM analysis confirmed that DPA samples had larger (203.08 ± 2651.65 μm²) and more numerous particles compared to TFA (0.23 ± 27.53 μm²), even though it was not possible to distinguish the MPs and NPs due to clustering of the plastic residuals. AFM analysis indicated a bigger root mean square grain size for TFA than DPA; similarly, the mean roughness was lesser in the DPA sample than TFA one.

Conclusions: DPA generated larger and more numerous plastic particles compared to TFA, though grain-size characterization was challenging due to particle aggregation. This suggests that the manufacturing process and materials used in DPA could impact the creation of MPs and NPs during simulated mastication, highlighting a potential area for process optimization.

Keywords: direct printed aligners; microscopy analysis; microsplastics; nanoplastics; thermoformed aligners.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest, or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Optical microscopy images at 4x magnification comparing DPA (A) and TFA (B) samples.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
TEM images at low magnification, comparing DPA (A) and TFA (B) samples.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
AFM images, comparing DPA (A) and TFA (B) samples.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
3D surface reconstruction of the height map of DPA (A) and TFA (B) observed under 3 × 3μm AFM surface.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Panayi NC, Efstathiou S, Christopoulou I, et al. Digital orthodontics: present and future. AJO-DO Clinical Companion 2023;4:14–25.
    1. Ben Gassem AA. Does clear aligner treatment result in different patient perceptions of treatment process and outcomes compared to conventional/traditional fixed appliance treatment: a literature review. Eur J Dent 2022;16:274–85. https://doi.org/ 10.1055/s-0041-1739441 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Saccomanno S, Saran S, Laganà D, et al. Motivation, perception, and behavior of the adult orthodontic patient: a survey analysis. Biomed Res Int 2022;2022:2754051. https://doi.org/ 10.1155/2022/2754051 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Narongdej P, Hassanpour M, Alterman N, et al. Advancements in clear aligner fabrication: a comprehensive review of direct-3D printing technologies. Polymers (Basel) 2024;16:371. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/polym16030371 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tartaglia GM, Mapelli A, Maspero C, et al. Direct 3D printing of clear orthodontic aligners: current state and future possibilities. Materials (Basel) 2021;14:1799. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/ma14071799 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types