Comparison of multiple arterial grafts vs. single arterial graft in coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 40212880
- PMCID: PMC11983608
- DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1555242
Comparison of multiple arterial grafts vs. single arterial graft in coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Observational studies and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have yielded conflicting results regarding the outcomes of multiple arterial grafts (MAG) vs. single arterial grafts (SAG) in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. We conducted a comprehensive search across multiple databases for RCTs that directly compared MAG and SAG. The clinical outcomes assessed included all-cause mortality, cardiac-specific mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), repeat revascularization, stroke, sternal wound complications, and major bleeding. Outcomes were measured using hazard ratios (HR), relative risks (RR), and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Eighteen RCTs involving 10,143 patients were included in the analysis. The follow-up period ranged from 6 months to 12.6 years, and the average age of the patients across the studies ranged between 56.3 and 77.3 years. MAG and SAG did not differ significantly in terms of the incidence of sternal wound complications, major bleeding, or stroke following CABG. However, the MAG group demonstrated a lower risk of all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, MI, and repeat revascularization compared with the SAG group. MAG was associated with higher survival, lower risk of MI, and fewer repeat revascularization. Nonetheless, there were no significant differences in the incidence of sternal wound infections, major bleeding, and stroke between MAG and SAG.
Keywords: coronary artery bypass graft (CABG); multiple arterial graft (MAG); randomized controlled trials (RCTs); single arterial graft (SAG); survival.
© 2025 Ding, Zhu, Lu, Cheng and Ge.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures






Similar articles
-
Meta-Analysis Comparing Multiple Arterial Grafts Versus Single Arterial Graft for Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting.Am J Cardiol. 2020 Sep 1;130:46-55. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.06.012. Epub 2020 Jun 16. Am J Cardiol. 2020. PMID: 32665129
-
Multiple Arterial Grafting Is Associated With Better Outcomes for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Patients.Circulation. 2018 Nov 6;138(19):2081-2090. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.034464. Circulation. 2018. PMID: 30474420
-
Ticagrelor monotherapy versus aspirin in patients undergoing multiple arterial or single arterial coronary artery bypass grafting: insights from the TiCAB trial.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Apr 1;57(4):732-739. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz313. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020. PMID: 31750899
-
Multiple Versus Single Arterial Coronary Bypass Graft Surgery for Multivessel Disease.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Sep 10;74(10):1275-1285. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.06.067. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019. PMID: 31488263
-
Differences in long-term survival outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting using single vs multiple arterial grafts: a meta-analysis with reconstructed time-to-event data and subgroup analyses.Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Feb;71(2):77-89. doi: 10.1007/s11748-022-01891-7. Epub 2022 Nov 17. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023. PMID: 36394709 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Boylan MJ, Lytle BW, Loop FD, Taylor PC, Borsh JA, Goormastic M, et al. Surgical treatment of isolated left anterior descending coronary stenosis. Comparison of left internal mammary artery and venous autograft at 18–20 years of follow-up. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. (1994) 107(3):657–62. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials