Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar 27:7:1553565.
doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1553565. eCollection 2025.

Investigating the accuracy of Garmin PPG sensors on differing skin types based on the Fitzpatrick scale: cross-sectional comparison study

Affiliations

Investigating the accuracy of Garmin PPG sensors on differing skin types based on the Fitzpatrick scale: cross-sectional comparison study

Annie Icenhower et al. Front Digit Health. .

Abstract

Background: Commercial wearable devices, which are often capable of estimating heart rate via photoplethysmography (PPG), are increasingly used in health promotion. In recent years, researchers have investigated whether the accuracy of PPG-measured heart rate varies based on skin pigmentation, focusing particularly on the accuracy of such devices among users with darker skin tones. As such, manufacturers of wearable devices have implemented strategies to improve accuracy. Given the ever-changing nature of the wearable device industry and the important health implications of providing accurate heart rate estimates for all individuals no matter their skin color, studies exploring the impact of pigmentation on PPG accuracy must be regularly replicated.

Objective: We aimed to contrast heart rate readings collected via PPG using the Garmin Forerunner 45 in comparison with an electrocardiogram (ECG) during various levels of physical activity across a diverse group of participants representing a range of skin tones.

Methods: Heart rate data were collected from adult participants (18-64 years of age) at a single study session using the Garmin Forerunner 45 PPG-equipped smartwatch and the Polar H10 ECG chest strap. Skin tone was self-reported via the Fitzpatrick scale. Each participant completed two 10 min bouts of moderate-intensity walking or jogging separated by a 10 min bout of light walking.

Results: A series of mixed ANOVAs indicated no significant interaction between Fitzpatrick score and phase of the activity bout (i.e., rest at the start, first intensity ramp-up phase, first steady-state phase, active rest, second ramp-up phase, and second steady-state phase). Similarly, there was no significant main effect for the Fitzpatrick score, although there was a significant main effect for phase, which was driven by greater ECG-recorded heart rate relative to PPG during the first ramp-up phase.

Conclusion: Our findings support prior research demonstrating no significant impact of skin tone on PPG-measured heart rate, with significant differences between PPG- and ECG-measured heart rate emerging during dynamic changes in activity intensity. As commercial heart rate monitoring technology and software continue to evolve, it will be vital to replicate studies investigating the impact of skin tone due to the rapidity with which widely used wearable technologies advance.

Keywords: equity; exercise; heart rate; physical activity; wearables.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Bland–Altman plots contrasting differences in ECG vs. PPG by average across both devices. The lines are plotted for average difference and 95% confidence limits around the mean difference.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Scatter plot showing the relationship between participant Fitzpatrick scores and the difference between ECG and PPG heart rate values during the second ramp phase.

Similar articles

References

    1. Mandolesi L, Polverino A, Montuori S, Foti F, Ferraioli G, Sorrentino P, et al. Effects of physical exercise on cognitive functioning and wellbeing: biological and psychological benefits. Front Psychol. (2018) 9:509. 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00509 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blair SN, Jacobs DR, Powell KE. Relationships between exercise or physical activity and other health behaviors. Public Health Rep. (1985) 100(2):172–80. - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Physical activity. (2024). Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/physical-activity (accessed February 16, 2025)
    1. Hao T, Walter KN, Ball MJ, Chang HY, Sun S, Zhu X. Stresshacker: towards practical stress monitoring in the wild with smartwatches. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. (2017) 2017:830–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hirten RP, Danieletto M, Tomalin L, Choi KH, Zweig M, Golden E, et al. Factors associated with longitudinal psychological and physiological stress in health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: observational study using apple watch data. J Med Internet Res. (2021) 23(9):e31295. 10.2196/31295 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources