Implementing DPYD genotyping to predict chemotherapy toxicity in Australia: a feasibility study
- PMID: 40214188
- DOI: 10.1111/imj.16576
Implementing DPYD genotyping to predict chemotherapy toxicity in Australia: a feasibility study
Abstract
Background: Implementing pharmacogenomic-guided management in cancer patients equitably and effectively in a large population presents challenges. DPYD genotyping determines clinically significant variants of patients at increased risk of developing grade3-5 fluoropyrimidine (FP) toxicity. FP chemotherapies are prescribed for ~16,000 Australians with a 10%-40% grade3-4 toxicity incidence and 1% mortality. Variant carriers can have FP dosing adjusted to improve treatment tolerance without compromising anticancer effect. This strategy has not been formally adopted within Australia, despite widespread international standardisation.
Aim: This pilot study determined genotyping turnaround-times (TAT) for 4 DPYD variants (c.1905+1G>A, c.1679T>G, c.2846A>T and c.1236G>A/Haplotype B3) in Australian patients. Secondary objectives were identification of FP toxicities of DPYD variant carriers, and analysis of healthcare stakeholder perspectives, including enablers/barriers to implementation.
Methods: Genotyping was determined by Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction. Qualitative data were determined through semi-structured questionnaire.
Results: 104 patients recruited over 24 months had a mean TAT of 7.2 days, 5.2 business days (range 1-30). Grade3-4 toxicity occurred in 9/16 DPYD variant carriers, including 2 ICU admissions and 1 death. Themes from 30 questionnaire respondents suggest that clinical environment and resources were fundamental barriers, and motivation to improve patient care was the predominant enabler of change.
Conclusion: DPYD genotyping is feasible for improving precision-oncology for patients requiring FP chemotherapies. A TAT of 7 days is acceptable by both stakeholder respondents and national oncology clinician groups. This pilot study, although small, informs a large national project evaluating prospective DPYD genotyping and its impact on FP tolerability, patient safety and cost-effectiveness in Australia.
Keywords: DPYD; dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase; fluoropyrimidine; genotyping; pharmacogenomics.
© 2025 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.
References
-
- White C, Scott R, Paul CL, Ackland SP. Pharmacogenomics in the era of personalised medicine. Med J Aust 2022; 217: 510–513.
-
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Cancer in Australia 2019. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2019.
-
- Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021; 71: 209–249.
-
- Freites‐Martinez A, Santana N, Arias‐Santiago S, Viera A. Using the common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE ‐ version 5.0) to evaluate the severity of adverse events of anticancer therapies. Actas Dermosifiliogr 2021; 112: 90–92.
-
- Henricks LM, Opdam FL, Beijnen JH, Cats A, Schellens JHM. DPYD genotype‐guided dose individualization to improve patient safety of fluoropyrimidine therapy: call for a drug label update. Ann Oncol 2017; 28: 2915–2922.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
