Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Apr 11;22(1):15.
doi: 10.1007/s11897-025-00702-3.

Person-Centred Care: State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives

Affiliations
Review

Person-Centred Care: State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives

Hanna Gyllensten et al. Curr Heart Fail Rep. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: Many countries prioritise the implementation of person-centred care. This study examines the progression of research in person-centred care, specifically focusing on using complex interventions within intricate contexts. It aims to explore how previous experiences can inform and shape subsequent projects. The review was based on five studies from our research group, encompassing 1099 patients, resulting in 41 peer-reviewed scientific publications. Most studies focused on patients suffering from chronic heart failure, as well as patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Additionally, interventions for acute coronary syndrome and common mental disorders were also considered. Analyses included the development of a logical model for person-centred care, an overview of partnership operationalisation, and the establishment of evaluation criteria for the trials. The analyses involved creating a coherent model for person-centred care, examining partnership operationalisation, and establishing trial evaluation criteria.

Recent findings: Sequential trials build upon their predecessors and add new elements. The studies conducted by clinicians in usual care and in-house by research staff were complementary, providing a deeper understanding of the efficacy and effectiveness of person-centred care. Initiating, working, and safeguarding a partnership between patient and staff was possible, whether through in-person or remote communication. Evaluations followed modern research standards and incorporated past study insights for a more thorough approach. This study highlights how the cumulative experience from previous research in person-centred care informs the design and analyses of subsequent projects through an iterative learning process, particularly important for complex interventions in various health care contexts.

Keywords: Acute coronary syndrome; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Common mental disorders; Heart failure; Person-centred care; Pulmonary disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no financial or non-financial conflicts of interest to declare. Research Involving Human Participants: This point is irrelevant in this context, as this study relies solely on published literature. All the included studies had received ethical approvals and were further approved by relevant healthcare providers and register holder, as needed.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Logic model of person-centred care in the research programme. Abbreviations: gPCC = Gothenburg model for person-centred care; PCC = person-centred care
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Overview of partnership in the respective interventions. a The PCC interventions were planned jointly by patient representatives and care professionals in collaboration with the research team. All gPCC professionals had received training in the theory and practice of gPCC through lectures, seminars, and workshops and were given practice in formulating and executing gPCC plans. Abbreviations: gPCC = Gothenburg model for person-centred care; HCP = health care professional; PC = primary care; PCC = person-centred care; RN = Registered nurse

Similar articles

References

    1. Nolte E, Merkur S, Anell A. European observatory on health systems and policies, editors. Achieving person-centred health systems: evidence, strategies and challenges. Cambridge; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2020.
    1. Feldthusen C, Forsgren E, Wallström S, Andersson V, Löfqvist N, Sawatzky R, et al. Centredness in health care: A systematic overview of reviews. Health Expect. 2022. - PMC - PubMed
    1. HåkanssonEklund J, Holmström IK, Kumlin T, Kaminsky E, Skoglund K, Höglander J, et al. “Same same or different?” A review of reviews of person-centered and patient-centered care. Patient Educ Couns. 2019;102:3–11. - PubMed
    1. Gyllensten H, Björkman I, Jakobsson Ung E, Ekman I, Jakobsson S. A national research centre for the evaluation and implementation of person-centred care: Content from the first interventional studies. Health Expect. 2020;23:1362–75. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ekman I, Swedberg K, Taft C, Lindseth A, Norberg A, Brink E, et al. Person-centered care–ready for prime time. EurJCardiovascNurs. 2011;10:248–51. - PubMed

MeSH terms