Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 11;20(4):e0321476.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321476. eCollection 2025.

Wildfire impacts and mitigation strategies among California cannabis producers

Jeff Vance Martin  1   2 , Christopher Dillis  1   2 , Genoa Starrs  1   2 , Danielle Schell  1 , Theodore E Grantham  1   2 , Van Butsic  1   2
Affiliations

Wildfire impacts and mitigation strategies among California cannabis producers

Jeff Vance Martin et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

California has experienced increasing frequency and intensity of wildfire, with the five largest fires on record since 2018. Over the same period, licensed cannabis production has grown to a high-grossing industry, while remaining an important source of rural livelihood. Importantly, the geography of cannabis production overlaps with high fire hazard areas more than any other crop in the state. We developed and deployed a state-wide survey of licensed outdoor producers to determine direct and indirect impacts of wildfire, as well as how producers have responded to these threats. Quantitative and narrative data were subjected to statistical and thematic analyses, demonstrating key findings around fire-related losses, mitigation tools and techniques, and perceptions of risk. Producers experienced a range of impacts beyond direct burning, including reduced light (affecting grow rates), ash deposition (with impacts on product quality and saleability), and production disruptions. Producer responses to the threat of fire and smoke varied, in part affected by the costs of mitigation, yet some common strategies emerged. However, while most growers reported impacts from fire, these were often outweighed by concerns over other pressures on production and profitability. Our hope is that these findings around the experiences and concerns of California's cannabis producers will inform future research directions and provide the first steps toward policy interventions to better address the challenges of living with wildfire.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Wildfire-related effects.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Changes in farming due to wildfire.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Mitigation strategies reported.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Perceived effectiveness of mitigation strategies.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Producers’ top concerns.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Steel ZL, Safford HD, Viers JH. The fire frequency‐severity relationship and the legacy of fire suppression in California forests. Ecosphere. 2015;6(1):1–23. doi: 10.1890/es14-00224.1 - DOI
    1. van Wagtendonk JW, Sugihara NG, Stephens SL, eds. Fire in California’s Ecosystems. 2nd ed. University of California Press; 2018.
    1. Williams AP, Abatzoglou JT, Gershunov A, Guzman‐Morales J, Bishop DA, Balch JK, et al.. Observed Impacts of Anthropogenic Climate Change on Wildfire in California. Earth’s Future. 2019;7(8):892–910. doi: 10.1029/2019ef001210 - DOI
    1. Williams JN, Safford HD, Enstice N, Steel ZL, Paulson AK. High‐severity burned area and proportion exceed historic conditions in Sierra Nevada, California, and adjacent ranges. Ecosphere. 2023;14(1). doi: 10.1002/ecs2.4397 - DOI
    1. Kreider MR, Higuera PE, Parks SA, Rice WL, White N, Larson AJ. Fire suppression makes wildfires more severe and accentuates impacts of climate change and fuel accumulation. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):2412. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-46702-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed