Robotic-assisted single-port system for pulmonary lobectomy: A prospective feasibility study
- PMID: 40216299
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2025.04.004
Robotic-assisted single-port system for pulmonary lobectomy: A prospective feasibility study
Abstract
Objective: To confirm the feasibility and safety of the da Vinci single-port (SP) System to perform pulmonary lobectomy procedures using a subcostal, uniportal approach.
Methods: A prospective multicenter, single-arm clinical study evaluating the performance and safety of the da Vinci SP Surgical System for pulmonary lobectomy.
Results: Nineteen subjects (benign, n = 1; malignant, n = 18) were enrolled at 6 academic medical centers in the United States and underwent robotic-assisted SP subcostal lobectomy. All SP lobectomy procedures were completed without conversion to multiport thoracoscopic/robotic or open approaches. No intraoperative adverse events (AEs) or unanticipated adverse device effects were observed; 13 postoperative AEs commonly experienced after lobectomy were reported, 4 of which were Clavien-Dindo grade III. The rate of complete resection (ie, R0) was 100%. The median number of nodal stations sampled was 6.5 (interquartile range [IQR], 6.0-8.0) with a median of 17.5 (IQR, 7.0-34.0) nodes resected per patient.
Conclusions: Robotic SP subcostal lobectomy is feasible and is associated with acceptable perioperative and oncologic quality outcomes. Additional clinical experience and research are needed to determine whether this alternative single incision approach has clinical benefit compared to standard transthoracic, multiport robotic lobectomy.
Keywords: lobectomy; lung cancer; robot; single port; subcostal; uniportal.
Copyright © 2025 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest Statement BP reported payments or honoraria from BD and Medtronic. J.W. reported consulting fees from Intuitive Surgical and Medtronic. H.S. reported honoraria from Intuitive Surgical. Intuitive Surgical provided funding to the authors’ institutions for study-specific research, data monitoring and collection, and funding to third parties for statistical analysis. All other authors reported no conflicts of interest. The Journal policy requires editors and reviewers to disclose conflicts of interest and to decline handling or reviewing manuscripts for which they may have a conflict of interest. The editors and reviewers of this article have no conflicts of interest.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical