Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Apr 11.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-025-02669-7. Online ahead of print.

An embedded computational framework of memory: The critical role of representations in veridical and false recall predictions

Affiliations
Review

An embedded computational framework of memory: The critical role of representations in veridical and false recall predictions

Dominic Guitard et al. Psychon Bull Rev. .

Abstract

Human memory is reconstructive and thus fundamentally imperfect. One of its critical flaws is false recall-the erroneous recollection of unstudied items. Despite its significant implications, false recall poses a challenge for existing computational models of serial recall, which struggle to provide item-specific predictions. Across six experiments, each involving 100 young adults, we address this issue using the Embedded Computational Framework of Memory (eCFM) that integrates existing accounts of semantic and episodic memory. While the framework provides a comprehensive account of memory processing, its innovation lies in the inclusion of a comprehensive lexicon of word knowledge derived from distributional semantic models. By integrating a lexicon that captures orthographic, phonological, and semantic relationships within an episodic memory model, the eCFM successfully accounts for patterns of veridical serial recall (e.g., proportion correct, intralist errors, omissions) while also capturing false recall (e.g., extralist errors including both critical lures and non-critical lures). We demonstrate the model's capabilities through simulations applied to six experiments, with lists of words (Experiments 1A, 1B, 2A, and 2B) and non-words (Experiments 3A and 3B) that are either related or unrelated semantically (Experiments 1A and 1B), phonologically (Experiments 2A and 2B), or orthographically (Experiments 3A and 3B). This approach fills a computational gap in modelling serial recall and underscores the importance of integrating traditionally separate areas of semantic and episodic memory to provide more precise predictions and holistic memory models.

Keywords: Computational model; Distributional semantic models; False recall; Serial recall.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethical approval: All studies were approved by the Cardiff School of Psychology Ethics Committee. Consent to participate: All participants provided electronic consent before participating in the study. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Conflict of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

References

    1. Arndt, J., & Hirshman, E. (1998). True and false recognition in MINERVA2: Explanations from a global matching perspective. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 371–391. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2581 - DOI
    1. Armstrong, I. T., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (1995). Repetition deficit in rapid-serial-visual-presentation displays: Encoding failure or retrieval failure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(5), 1044–1052. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.21.5.1044 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aujla, H. (2021). Language experience predicts semantic priming of lexical decision. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75(3), 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/cep0000255 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baddeley, A. D. (1966). Short-term memory for word sequences as a function of acoustic, semantic and formal similarity. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18(4), 362–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640746608400055 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baddeley, A. (2012). Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100422 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources