Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun;18(2):514-522.
doi: 10.1007/s12194-025-00904-3. Epub 2025 Apr 11.

External and internal GATE/Geant4 dosimetric calculations on voxelized phantoms

Affiliations

External and internal GATE/Geant4 dosimetric calculations on voxelized phantoms

Merai Sondes et al. Radiol Phys Technol. 2025 Jun.

Abstract

Monte Carlo simulation employing the GATE (Geant4 Application for Tomographic Emission) code plays a crucial role in radiation transport studies for dose calculations within computational phantoms. This paper presents a set of absorbed doses calculated using computational phantom Zubal and Monte Carlo GATE code version 9.3, based on two radiation exposure configurations: external (radiological accident) and internal (using 131 I radionuclide). The results were validated through comparison with previous studies employing different Monte Carlo codes (MCNP, EGS4), and the reference female computational model proposed by ICRP report 110. The findings demonstrate good agreement between GATE results for Zubal phantom and published data with MCNP and EGS4, as well as alignment with ICRP 110 reference phantom results, for both external and internal irradiation scenarios. In addition, the comparison between Zubal and ICRP 110 phantom reveals a minimal variation, attributed to inherent anatomical and geometrical disparities.

Keywords: 131 I radionuclide; External and internal dosimetry; GATE/Geant4 code; Monte Carlo simulation; Zubal and ICRP 110 phantoms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. Ethics approval: This article does not report any studies performed with human participants. This article does not report any studies performed with animals.

References

    1. Chiavassa S, Lemosquet A, Aubineau-Laniece I, De Carlan L, Clairand I, Ferrer L, Bardies M, Franck D, Zankl M. Dosimetric comparison of monte carlo codes (EGS4, MCNP, MCNPX) considering external and internal exposures of the zubal phantom to electron and photon sources. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2005;116(1–4):631–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/nci063 . - DOI
    1. ICRP: International commission on radiological protection. adult reference computational phantoms, ICRP Publication 110. Ann ICRP 39, 1–166 (2009)
    1. Hadid L, Desbrée A, Schlattl H, Franck D. Application of the ICRP/ICRU reference computational phantoms to internal dosimetry: calculation of specific absorbed fractions of energy for photons and electrons. Phys Med Biol. 2010;55(13):3631–41. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/55/13/004 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lamart S, Bouville A, Simon SL, Eckerman KF, Melo D, Lee C. Comparison of internal dosimetry factors for three classes of adult computational phantoms with emphasis on [Formula: see text] in the thyroid. Phys Med Biol. 2011;56(22):7317–35. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/56/22/020 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Lamart S, Simon SL, Bouville A, Moroz BE, Lee C. S values for [Formula: see text] based on the ICRP adult voxel phantoms. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2016;168(1):92–110. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncv016 . - DOI

LinkOut - more resources