Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 12;11(1):26.
doi: 10.1038/s41514-025-00218-z.

1H-NMR-based metabolomics identifies disrupted betaine metabolism as distinct serum signature of pre-frailty

Affiliations

1H-NMR-based metabolomics identifies disrupted betaine metabolism as distinct serum signature of pre-frailty

Carmen Marino et al. NPJ Aging. .

Abstract

Increasing evidence suggests that frailty results from a complex age-associated metabolic decline. Here, we investigated the serum metabolomic profile of a well-characterized cohort of elderly subjects encompassing the whole fit-to-frail continuum. Enrichment analyses revealed a complex dysregulation of amino acids and energy metabolism in both pre-frail and frail participants. Remarkably, upregulated betaine levels emerged as a specific biochemical signature of pre-frail females, holding promise for the development of novel targeted interventions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Multivariate analysis reveals different serum metabolomic profiles between frail, pre-frail and non-frail participants.
a PLS-DA score scatter plots related to serum from pre-frail (n = 20), frail (n = 37) and non-frail participants (n = 39). The cluster analyses are reported in the Cartesian space described by the main components PC1:17.9% and PC2:7.4%. PLS-DA was evaluated using cross-validation (CV) analysis. CV tests performed according to the PLS-DA statistical protocol show a significant cluster separation (0.93 and 0.97 accuracy PC1 and PC2, respectively, with positive 0.78 and 0.79 Q2 indices). b VIP score graphs of metabolites discriminating the three clusters. c PLS-DA score scatter plots related to serum from pre-frail (n = 20), and frail subjects (n = 37). The cluster analyses are reported in the Cartesian space described by the main components PC1:17.4% and PC2:17.5%. PLS-DA was evaluated using cross-validation (CV) analysis. CV tests performed according to the PLS-DA statistical protocol show a significant cluster separation (0.76 and 0.87 accuracy PC1 and PC2 respectively, with positive 0.69 and 0.75 Q2 indices). d VIP score graphs of metabolites discriminating the two clusters.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Analysis of enrichment pinpoints shared and unique deregulated biochemical pathways among frail, pre-frail, and non-frail individuals.
Enrichment pathways analysis performed comparing a non-frail vs pre-frail, b non-frail vs frail and c frail vs pre-frail subjects. The discriminative pathways are ranked according to p-value and number of hits reported in the bars. d Venn diagram displaying the disrupted pathways emerged from the comparisons of frail and pre-frail subjects with non-frail controls. Blue box reports the unique pathway dysregulated in pre-frail but not in frail subjects; light yellow box reports the pathways enriched in frail but not in pre-frail subjects; dark yellow box reports the common pathways dysregulated in both frail and pre-frail participants.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Robust volcano plots highlighting the upregulated and downregulated metabolites in the serum of frail and pre-frail subjects.
ac Volcano plot analyses of metabolic changes in pre-frail vs non-frail, frail vs non-frail and pre-frail vs frail subjects’ serum. Each point on the volcano plot was based on p- and fold-change values, set at 0.05 and 1.0, respectively. Red and blue circles identify upregulated and downregulated metabolites, respectively. Variations are expressed as follows: panels a-b are graphed as a function of pathological group; panel c is graphed as a function of pre-frail group.

References

    1. Hoogendijk, E. O. et al. Frailty: implications for clinical practice and public health. Lancet394, 1365–1375 (2019). - PubMed
    1. Fried, L. P. et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.56, 146–157 (2001). - PubMed
    1. Trevisan, C. et al. Factors influencing transitions between frailty states in elderly adults: the progetto Veneto Anziani longitudinal study. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc.65, 179–184 (2017). - PubMed
    1. Gill, T. M., Gahbauer, E. A., Allore, H. G. & Han, L. Transitions between frailty states among community-living older persons. Arch. Intern. Med.166, 418–423 (2006). - PubMed
    1. Moqri, M. et al. Biomarkers of aging for the identification and evaluation of longevity interventions. Cell186, 3758–3775 (2023). - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources