Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 11;25(1):533.
doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05863-0.

Chemical, optical, and morphological properties of TPU and PET-G samples after aging in artificial saliva: an in vitro study

Affiliations

Chemical, optical, and morphological properties of TPU and PET-G samples after aging in artificial saliva: an in vitro study

Edoardo Staderini et al. BMC Oral Health. .

Abstract

Background: Thermoplastic materials, such as glycol-modified polyethylene terephthalate (PET-G) and thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU), undergo alterations due to environmental factors in the oral cavity, which can affect their composition and surface properties over time. While previous studies have explored these changes, a comprehensive characterization of TPU and PET-G properties, particularly after immersion in artificial saliva, remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the aging process of 24 TPU and 24 PET-G dumbbell-shaped specimens before and after exposure to artificial saliva. The analysis focused on the morphological, chemical, and optical properties of the samples, including thickness, weight, and surface roughness.

Methods: The study examined 48 thermoplastic samples, equally divided between PET-G and TPU. The samples were thermoformed into standardized shapes and analyzed at three time points: after thermoforming (T0), after 7 days (T1), and after 14 days (T2) of immersion in artificial saliva at 37 °C. Measurements included weight, thickness, surface roughness, absorbance, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA to identify significant changes over time, with a significance level of p < 0.01.

Results: Both materials exhibited significant reductions in surface roughness, with TPU showing a decrease in average roughness (Ra) from 99.43 nm at T0 to 76.53 nm at T2 (-23.02%) and PET-G decreasing from 33.25 nm to 20.19 nm (-39.27%). The root mean square roughness (Rq) in TPU declined by 41.67% (from 126.91 nm to 74.02 nm), while PET-G showed a reduction of 28.06% (from 44.98 nm to 32.35 nm). Peak-to-valley roughness (Rt) also decreased by 10.5% in TPU and 27.96% in PET-G. No statistically significant changes were observed in thickness, weight, optical density, or chemical composition (p > 0.01). The roughness disparity between TPU and PET-G persisted even after immersion in saliva.

Conclusions: Following the simulated intraoral aging process, significant changes in surface roughness were observed in TPU and PET-G specimens. The reduction in roughness, particularly a 39.27% decline in PET-G and 23.02% in TPU, has been clinically associated with decreased plaque accumulation and reduced friction between the aligner and the teeth.

Keywords: Artificial saliva aging; Clear aligners; Morphological properties; Surface roughness; Thermoplastic materials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PLA customized supports
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Average weight of the TPU and PET-G samples at T0, T1, T2
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Average thickness of the TPU and PET-G samples at T0, T1, T2
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
(a) Peak-to-valley roughness TPU charts at T0, T1, T2; (b) Average roughness TPU charts at T0, T1, T2; (c) RMS roughness TPU charts at T0, T1, T2; (d) Peak-to-valley roughness PET-G charts at T0, T1, T2; (e) Average roughness PET-G charts at T0, T1, T2; c) RMS roughness PET-g charts at T0, T1, T2
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Representative surface of the TPU and PET-G samples at T0 and T2 made with the atomic force microscope
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
(a) Average Roughness TPU and PET-G Cartesian graph; (b) RMS roughness TPU and PET-G Cartesian graph; (c) Peak-to-valley TPU and PET-G Cartesian graph
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Absorbance spectra of the TPU samples at T0, T1 and T2
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Absorbance spectra of the PET-G samples at T0, T1 and T2
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Average FTIR spectroscopy spectrum of the TPU samples at T0, T1 and T2
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
Average FTIR spectroscopy spectrum of the PET-G samples at T0, T1 and T2

Similar articles

References

    1. Walton DK, Fields HW, Johnston WM, Rosenstiel SF, Firestone AR, Christensen JC. Orthodontic appliance preferences of children and adolescents. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2010;138(6):698.e1-698.e12. - PubMed
    1. Shi C, Feng Y, Hsiao YC, Smith J, Jin C, Farella M, et al. Clear aligners brands and marketing claims: an overview of available information on the web. Australasian Orthodontic J. 2022;38(2):252–62.
    1. Zhang N, Bai Y, Ding X, Zhang Y. Preparation and characterization of thermoplastic materials for invisible orthodontics. Dent Mater J. 2011;30(6):954–9. - PubMed
    1. Bichu YM, Alwafi A, Liu X, Andrews J, Ludwig B, Bichu AY, et al. Advances in orthodontic clear aligner materials. Bioact Mater. 2023;22:384–403. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ihssen BA, Willmann JH, Nimer A, Drescher D. Effect of in vitro aging by water immersion and thermocycling on the mechanical properties of PETG aligner material. J Orofac Orthop. 2019;80(6):292–303. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources