Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 11;25(1):526.
doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05845-2.

Histological and immunohistochemical analysis of human periapical lesions: a study of TGF-β1 and CD68 markers

Affiliations

Histological and immunohistochemical analysis of human periapical lesions: a study of TGF-β1 and CD68 markers

Nermeen AbuBakr et al. BMC Oral Health. .

Abstract

Background: Various inflammatory and anti-inflammatory mediators, along with diverse cell types, are implicated in the development and progression of periapical lesions. This work aimed to assess the immuno-expression of transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-β1) and CD68 (a macrophage marker), elucidating their roles and potential correlations. Additionally, histological analysis was conducted to evaluate the intensity of inflammatory infiltrates in chronic periapical lesion samples.

Methods: Tissue samples from fifty individuals with chronic periapical lesions [25 radicular cysts (RCs) and 25 periapical granulomas (PGs)] were obtained, along with control samples from four healthy third molars' dental pulp. Histological examination and inflammatory infiltrate categorization were performed. Immunohistochemical analysis of TGF-β1 and CD68 markers, along with morphometric assessment, were conducted.

Results: The control group displayed normal, inflammation-free pulp tissues, while intense inflammation was observed in PGs and RCs (Score 4 and 3, respectively) dominated by macrophages, plasma cells, and lymphocytes. Immunohistochemistry showed higher TGF-β1 and CD68 expression in PGs and RCs versus control (P < 0.001). Moreover, PGs exhibited greater TGF-β1 and CD68 expression than RCs (P < 0.001). However, a negative relationship was detected between the 2 markers (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: This study highlighted varying expressions of TGF-β1 and CD68 in PGs and RCs, indicating their potential roles in lesion pathology. However, a negative correlation between these markers was observed. Accordingly, their precise role in periapical lesion progression and repair requires further investigation.

Keywords: Immunohistochemistry; Inflammation; Macrophages; Periapical granuloma; Radicular cyst.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethical approval and consent to participate: Ethical approval for this study was granted by the Institutional Ethical Committee of the Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University (Approval no. 16/10/21), in line with the guidelines set forth in the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was acquired from all participating patients before sample collection, following a thorough explanation of the study’s goals, procedures, and any potential discomforts and risks.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Representative histological photomicrographs using H&E staining. a, d. Healthy pulp tissues showing normal histology without any noticeable inflammatory cell infiltration. b, e. Radicular cyst revealing numerous inflammatory cell infiltration (orange arrows) & thin-walled dilated blood vessels (red arrows). c, f. Periapical granuloma displaying numerous inflammatory cell infiltration (orange arrows), fibroblasts (blue arrows) & plasma cells (red arrows) (a-c Orig. Mag. × 100; d-f Orig. Mag. × 400)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Representative photomicrographs of immunohistochemical staining of TGF-β1. a, d. weak staining in healthy pulp tissue; b, e. intense staining in radicular cyst; c, f. intense staining in periapical granuloma (a-c Orig. Mag. × 100; d-f Orig. Mag. × 400)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Representative photomicrographs of immunohistochemical staining of CD68 + cells. a, d. weak staining in healthy pulp tissue; b, e. intense staining in radicular cyst; c, f. intense staining in periapical granuloma (a-c Orig. Mag. × 100; d-f Orig. Mag. × 400)

Similar articles

References

    1. Karamifar K, Tondari A, Saghiri MA. Endodontic periapical lesion: an overview on the etiology, diagnosis and current treatment modalities. Eur Endod J. 2020;5(2):54–67. 10.14744/eej.2020.42714. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dessaune N, Porpino MT, Antunes HD, Rodrigues RC, Perez AR, Pires FR et al. Pro-inflammatory and antiinflammatory cytokine expression in post-treatment apical periodontitis. J Appl Oral Sci. 2018; 26:e20170455. doi.10.1590/1678-7757-2017-0455. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Braz-Silva PH, Bergamini ML, Mardegan AP, De Rosa CS, Hasseus B, Jonasson P. Inflammatory profile of chronic apical periodontitis: a literature review. Acta Odontol Scand. 2019;77(3):173–80. 10.1080/00016357.2018.1521005. - PubMed
    1. Ricucci D, Bergenholtz G. Histologic features of apical periodontitis in human biopsies. Endod Top. 2005;8(1):68–87. 10.1111/j.1601-1546.2004.00097.x.
    1. Koivisto T, Bowles WR, Rohrer M. Frequency and distribution of radiolucent jaw lesions: a retrospective analysis of 9,723 cases. J Endod. 2012;38:729–32. 10.1016/j.joen.2012.02.028. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources