Characteristics associated with differences in 24-hour device-measured and self-reported sleep, sedentary behaviour and physical activity in a sample of Australian primary school children
- PMID: 40217407
- PMCID: PMC11960218
- DOI: 10.1186/s44167-023-00023-7
Characteristics associated with differences in 24-hour device-measured and self-reported sleep, sedentary behaviour and physical activity in a sample of Australian primary school children
Abstract
Background: How much time children spend sleeping, being sedentary and participating in physical activity affects their health and well-being. To provide accurate guidelines for children's time use, it is important to understand the differences between device-measured and self-reported use-of-time measures, and what may influence these differences. Among Australian primary school-aged children, this study aimed to describe the differences between device-measured and self-reported sleep, sedentary behaviour, light-intensity physical activity (LPA), and moderate-vigorous-intensity physical activity (MVPA), and to explore how sociodemographic and personal characteristics were associated with these differences.
Methods: Participants (n = 120, 67% female, age 9-11 years) were drawn from the Life on Holidays cohort study. Device measured use of time was from 7-day accelerometry worn over five timepoints in a 2-year period, and self-reported use of time was from 2-day Multimedia Activity Recall for Children and Adults (MARCA), conducted at the same timepoints. For each participant and measurement method, average daily time spent in sleep, sedentary time, LPA and MVPA was derived for any overlapping days (that had both types of measurement) across the study period. Participant characteristics were either obtained from baseline parental survey (age, sex, parental education, puberty) or derived from the average of direct measurements across the study timepoints (aerobic fitness from shuttle run, body mass index from anthropometric measurements, academic performance from national standardised tests). Differences between device-measured and self-reported use of time were described using Bland-Altmann plots. Compositional outcome linear-regression models were used to determine which participant characteristics were associated with differences by use-of-time measurement type.
Results: Relative to device-measured, self-reported daily LPA was underestimated by 83 min (35% difference), whilst sleep (+ 37 min; 6% difference), MVPA (+ 34 min; 33% difference) and sedentary time (+ 12 min; 3% difference) were overestimated. Characteristics underpinning the differences between measurement types were sex (χ2 = 11.9, p = 0.008), parental education (χ2 = 23.0, p = 0.001), aerobic fitness (χ2 = 10.7, p = 0.01) and academic performance (χ2 = 15.9, p = 0.001).
Conclusions: Among primary school-aged children, device-measured and self-reported use-of-time measurements should not be used interchangeably as there are systematic biases and differences relative to socio-demographic characteristics.
Keywords: 24-hour recall; Accelerometry; Physical activity; Sedentary; Sleep; Time use.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Ethical approval was obtained from the University of South Australia Human Research Ethics Committee, Adelaide, Australia (200980), the South Australian Department of Education and Child Development (2008-0055) and Catholic Education South Australia (201820). Written informed consent was obtained by a parent/guardian, and verbal assent to proceed with a test or measurement was obtained from participants. Any child, or parent/guardian on behalf of the child, could withdraw from the study at any time without penalty. Consent for publication: NA. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Changes in 24-hour movement behaviours during the transition from primary to secondary school among Australian children.Eur J Sport Sci. 2022 Aug;22(8):1276-1286. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2021.1903562. Epub 2021 Apr 2. Eur J Sport Sci. 2022. PMID: 33719925
-
Device-measured sedentary behavior and physical activity in older adults differ by demographic and health-related factors.Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. 2020 Jun 11;17:8. doi: 10.1186/s11556-020-00241-x. eCollection 2020. Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. 2020. PMID: 32537028 Free PMC article.
-
Life on holidays: differences in activity composition between school and holiday periods in Australian children.BMC Public Health. 2019 Jun 3;19(Suppl 2):450. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6765-6. BMC Public Health. 2019. PMID: 31159768 Free PMC article.
-
Interventions outside the workplace for reducing sedentary behaviour in adults under 60 years of age.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 17;7(7):CD012554. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012554.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32678471 Free PMC article.
-
Health outcomes associated with reallocations of time between sleep, sedentary behaviour, and physical activity: a systematic scoping review of isotemporal substitution studies.Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Jul 13;15(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0691-3. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018. PMID: 30001713 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Comprehensive scoping review on adherence to 24-hour movement guidelines and socioeconomic indicators in children and adolescents.PLoS One. 2025 Apr 17;20(4):e0321103. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321103. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 40245003 Free PMC article.
-
Digital citizen science for ethical monitoring of youth physical activity frequency: Comparing mobile ecological prospective assessments and retrospective recall.PLOS Digit Health. 2025 May 2;4(5):e0000840. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000840. eCollection 2025 May. PLOS Digit Health. 2025. PMID: 40315264 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Carson V, Hunter S, Kuzik N, Gray CE, Poitras VJ, Chaput JP, et al. Systematic review of sedentary behaviour and health indicators in school-aged children and youth: an update. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016;41(6):240–S65. - PubMed
-
- Chaput JP, Gray CE, Poitras VJ, Carson V, Gruber R, Olds T, et al. Systematic review of the relationships between sleep duration and health indicators in school-aged children and youth. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016;41(6):266–S82. - PubMed
-
- Poitras VJ, Gray CE, Borghese MM, Carson V, Chaput JP, Janssen I, et al. Systematic review of the relationships between objectively measured physical activity and health indicators in school-aged children and youth. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016;41(6):197–S239. - PubMed
-
- Okely AD, Ghersi D, Loughran SP, Cliff DP, Shilton T, Jones RA, et al. A collaborative approach to adopting/adapting guidelines. The australian 24-hour movement guidelines for children (5–12 years) and young people (13–17 years): an integration of physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022;19(1):1–21. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Jurakic D, Pedišić Ž. Croatian 24-Hour guidelines for physical activity, sedentary Behaviour, and sleep: a proposal based on a systematic review of literature. Medicus. 2019;28(2):143–53.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous