Referral reasons of type 2 diabetes patients from general practitioners to diabetes specialists: a cross-sectional observational study
- PMID: 40217473
- PMCID: PMC11987207
- DOI: 10.1186/s12875-025-02809-x
Referral reasons of type 2 diabetes patients from general practitioners to diabetes specialists: a cross-sectional observational study
Abstract
Background: Diabetes is a global public health concern. The follow-up of patients with diabetes is often undertaken by general practitioners (GPs), but referral rates to specialists show variations. The primary objective of this study was to describe the factors associated with the referral of type 2 diabetes patients from GPs to diabetes specialists.
Methods: An observational survey-based cross-sectional study was conducted with GPs practicing in France between 17 May 2023 and 13 July 2023. Physician characteristics, referral rate and attitudes towards referral were collected. Characteristics associated with frequent referrals were evaluated using a multivariable logistic regression model.
Results: A total of 325 GPs located in 52 departments (mean age 43 years) responded to the questionnaire. Most responding GPs were women (63%). Most GPs (76%) stated that they rarely or never referred their patients with type 2 diabetes to a diabetes specialist. The most frequent barrier to referral was delays in accessing a specialist (57%), and it was often cited both in the infrequent referral group (56%) and the frequent referral group (58%). In multivariable analysis, higher referral rates were associated with physician age (Odds Ratio OR per year 1.04, 95% Confidence Interval CI 1.01 to 1.07), diabetes care network membership (OR 2.81, 95% CI 1.15 to 6.88), referrals motivated by the introduction of insulin therapy (OR 2.73, 95%CI 1.44 to 5.34) or to consolidate communication about therapeutics and compliance (OR 2.34, 95%CI 1.18 to 4.67), expecting advice regarding new medication such as SGLT-2 inhibitors (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.11 to 3.98), and the mention of patient refusal as one of the main barriers to referral (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.03 to 3.38) were associated with higher referral rates. Conversely, doubts about the added value of the diabetes specialist was associated with infrequent referrals (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.66).
Conclusions: These factors indicate a possible role for lasting professional relationships, where trust built over shared network memberships and years of practice can facilitate referrals. Newly established GPs may find it beneficial to contact specialists in their region to discuss referral procedures. This could facilitate the referral of patients and improve access to specialist care.
Keywords: Diabetes; Diabetologist; General practitioner; Healthcare networks; Primary care; Referral.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: In accordance with law N° 2021 − 300 (March 5, 2012), this physician survey did not require approval by an ethics committee. This physician survey was not subject to the Jardé law since it did not fall within the scope of Article R.1121-1 of the French Public Health Code. Informed consent was obtained from all physicians to participate in the study. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Physician characteristics associated with the referral from general practitioners to dental surgeons and proposal for a referral letter template endorsed by dental surgeons in France: a nationwide cross-sectional survey-based study.BMC Prim Care. 2025 Feb 8;26(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02734-z. BMC Prim Care. 2025. PMID: 39923052 Free PMC article.
-
Reasons for choice of referral physician among primary care and specialist physicians.J Gen Intern Med. 2012 May;27(5):506-12. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1861-z. Epub 2011 Sep 16. J Gen Intern Med. 2012. PMID: 21922159 Free PMC article.
-
Emergency department referral patterns of Australian general practitioner registrars: a cross-sectional analysis of prevalence, nature and associations.Aust Health Rev. 2019 Feb;43(1):21-28. doi: 10.1071/AH17005. Aust Health Rev. 2019. PMID: 29117892
-
Urban Australian general practitioners' perceptions of falls risk screening, falls risk assessment, and referral practices for falls prevention: an exploratory cross-sectional survey study.Aust Health Rev. 2017 Mar;41(1):111-119. doi: 10.1071/AH15152. Aust Health Rev. 2017. PMID: 27096324
-
Evaluating clinical guidelines for chronic disease management: Do they enable the personalization of care?Public Health. 2025 Jan;238:131-138. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.11.023. Epub 2024 Dec 8. Public Health. 2025. PMID: 39652981
Cited by
-
Prescribing Antidiabetic Medications Among GPs in Croatia-A Real-Life Cross-Sectional Study.Biomedicines. 2025 Jun 17;13(6):1491. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13061491. Biomedicines. 2025. PMID: 40564210 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Reznik Y, Naiditch N, Thébaut JF, Havet A, Bénard S, Riveline JP. Epidemiology and health impact of diabetes in France. Ann Endocrinol. 2023;84(1):21–31. 10.1016/j.ando.2022.05.005. - PubMed
-
- Siah QZ, Ubeysekara NH, Taylor PN, Davies SJ, Wong FS, Dayan CM, et al. Referral rates of patients with diabetes to secondary care are inversely related to the prevalence of diabetes in each primary care practice and confidence in treatment, not to HbA1c level. Prim Care Diabetes. 2021;15(3):513–7. 10.1016/j.pcd.2021.02.004. - PubMed
-
- Balkau B, Bouée S, Avignon A, Vergès B, Chartier I, Amelineau E, et al. Type 2 diabetes treatment intensification in general practice in France in 2008–2009: the diattitude study. Diabetes Metab. 2012;38(Suppl 3):S29–35. 10.1016/S1262-3636(12)71532-X. - PubMed
-
- Foy R, Hempel S, Rubenstein L, Suttorp M, Seelig M, Shanman R, et al. Meta-analysis: effect of interactive communication between collaborating primary care physicians and specialists. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152(4):247–58. 10.7326/0003-4819-152-4-201002160-00010. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical