Sarcopenia as a Prognostic Factor for the Outcomes of Surgical Treatment of Colorectal Carcinoma
- PMID: 40218024
- PMCID: PMC11989190
- DOI: 10.3390/healthcare13070726
Sarcopenia as a Prognostic Factor for the Outcomes of Surgical Treatment of Colorectal Carcinoma
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Sarcopenia, defined as the progressive loss of muscle mass and function, is increasingly associated with worse outcomes in the surgical treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC). This paper focuses on analyzing the impact of sarcopenia as a prognostic factor on postoperative outcomes in CRC patients. The aim of the study is to identify the main factors influencing postoperative results. This will be accomplished via bibliometric analysis and highlighting the significance of muscle condition in the preoperative assessment of patients. Methods: The methodological approach involves analyzing bibliographic data from relevant scientific databases focused on sarcopenia and oncological surgery. The study employs a quantitative analysis of citations and collaborations among authors and institutions. The focus will be on research publications from 2013, when we first identified references to sarcopenia in the examined context. Results: The results show that sarcopenia significantly increases the risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality in CRC patients. Network analysis and keyword mapping reveal dominant research topics such as muscle condition, mortality, and postoperative complications. Meanwhile, we identify the need for standardized diagnostic methods for sarcopenia and their integration into clinical practice to improve predictive models and clinical approaches. Conclusions: These findings underscore the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration, preoperative assessment of muscle condition, and the implementation of standardized approaches to improve clinical outcomes for patients.
Keywords: bibliometric analysis; colorectal carcinoma; prognostic factor; sarcopenia; surgical treatment.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures












References
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources