Patient Perspectives on the Care in a Long COVID Outpatient Clinic-A Regional Qualitative Analysis from Germany
- PMID: 40218114
 - PMCID: PMC11988876
 - DOI: 10.3390/healthcare13070818
 
Patient Perspectives on the Care in a Long COVID Outpatient Clinic-A Regional Qualitative Analysis from Germany
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Long COVID specialized outpatient clinics (sOCs), which are part of the recommended long COVID care, usually face high demand. Few studies focused on the experience of care in such facilities in Germany. This study investigated how patients experience care in a sOC at a German university hospital. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients attending this clinic between October 2022 and January 2023. Data analysis was based on thematic analysis. Results: The themes from interviews with 14 patients (F = 11, M = 3) could be broadly categorized into statements on the pathway to the sOC, and statements on care provided in the sOC. Findings show that patients' high expectations at the sOC appointment were shaped by previous experiences with care, which were mainly perceived as inadequate. Care in the sOC was predominantly perceived as competent, empathetic and relevant for further care and coping with the disease. A deterioration in health directly related to the consultation (classifiable as post-exertional malaise) was frequently described, as was a high need for ongoing consultation. Conclusions: Overall, the findings point to a need for adaptations in the sOC, such as identifying optimized models of care and tailoring them to the patients' limited resources. This includes measures to improve care outside the sOC.
Keywords: health systems research; outpatient clinic; post-COVID; primary care; specialist care.
Conflict of interest statement
During data collection and analysis, Sandra Stengel worked as a specialist in the institution whose patients’ perspectives were being studied. To minimize the development of biases, Sandra Stengel was not involved in data collection and primary data analysis. During the study, she regularly reflected on her own assumptions, experiences and different roles in this context to be aware of various aspects influencing her perspective. During data collection and analysis, Uta Merle worked as a senior physician and Karin Tarbet worked as a nurse in the institution whose patients’ perspectives were being studied. Uta Merle and Karin Tarbet were not involved in data collection and in data analysis but only gave feedback and her consent on the conceptualization of the study and on the manuscript. Karin Tarbet also supported the recruitment of the study participants. Sandra Stengel and Uta Merle declare no further conflicts of interest. Lea Gölz, Regina Poß-Doering, and Michel Wensing declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
References
- 
    
- Long COVID or Post-COVID Conditions. [(accessed on 4 February 2025)]; Available online: https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/133106.
 
 - 
    
- Fernandez-de-Las-Peñas C., Notarte K.I., Macasaet R., Velasco J.V., Catahay J.A., Ver A.T., Chung W., Valera-Calero J.A., Navarro-Santana M. Persistence of post-COVID symptoms in the general population two years after SARS-CoV-2 infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Infect. 2024;88:77–88. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2023.12.004. - DOI - PubMed
 
 
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
