Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 7;13(7):836.
doi: 10.3390/healthcare13070836.

Assessing Patient Satisfaction with Hospital Services: Perspectives from Bihor County Emergency Hospital, Romania

Affiliations

Assessing Patient Satisfaction with Hospital Services: Perspectives from Bihor County Emergency Hospital, Romania

Aliz Ildiko Bradács et al. Healthcare (Basel). .

Abstract

Background/objectives: The objective of this study is to assess overall patient satisfaction with hospital services, including cleanliness, ward conditions, and food quality. Another key goal is to determine patient willingness to return for future medical services and identify the factors influencing this decision. Moreover, the study explores the relationship between patient satisfaction and continuity of care, as indicated by previous hospitalizations.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study to evaluate patient satisfaction at the Bihor County Emergency Clinical Hospital in Oradea, Romania. A standardized 40-item questionnaire was developed in accordance with the Framework Agreement on the provision of medical assistance within the Romanian healthcare system. The survey, which was administered over a four-year period (2019-2022), covered seven domains: demographic data, accessibility, hotel conditions, quality of care, patient safety and rights, overall satisfaction, and feedback. A total of 12,802 patients completed the questionnaire, and all statistical analyses were performed using R Studio.

Results: This study analyzes patient-reported satisfaction and experiences in a large healthcare facility, based on data from 12,802 participants. Overall, 91% of respondents rated the hospital positively, with 62% giving an excellent score. Spiritual assistance was well received (71%), and 70% of patients expressed willingness to return for future medical needs. Hospital cleanliness and ward conditions were rated highly, with 71% of respondents reporting excellent experiences. Food quality was positively reviewed by 66% of participants. Most patients (95%) confirmed proper hygiene practices by medical staff, and 95% were informed about their diagnosis. However, only 67% were aware of the complaint submission process. The dataset spans 2019-2022, with the highest hospitalizations in 2020 (36%) and obstetrics, cardiology, and general surgery being the most common specialties.

Conclusions: This dataset reflects a high level of patient satisfaction across multiple dimensions of hospital services, including cleanliness, quality of care, and patient information. However, areas such as complaint handling and transparency in medication handling require further attention to improve the overall patient experience. The findings underscore the hospital's strong performance in meeting patient expectations while identifying key areas for continued improvement.

Keywords: continuity of care; healthcare quality; hospital services; patient experience; patient satisfaction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Distribution of specialties by gender. (b) Distribution of specialties by year.
Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Distribution of specialties by gender. (b) Distribution of specialties by year.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of patient responses regarding the process for submitting suggestions and complaints.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Radar chart of patient satisfaction dimensions across hospital services.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Trends in positive, negative, and neutral ratings for four key aspects of patient satisfaction over time.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Trends in positive, negative, and neutral ratings for four aspects of the hospital environment.

References

    1. Jun J., Ojemeni M.M., Kalamani R., Tong J., Crecelius M.L. Relationship between Nurse Burnout, Patient and Organizational Outcomes: Systematic Review. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2021;119:103933. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103933. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aiken L.H., Sloane D.M., Ball J., Bruyneel L., Rafferty A.M., Griffiths P. Patient Satisfaction with Hospital Care and Nurses in England: An Observational Study. BMJ Open. 2021;8:e019189. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019189. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khullar D., Prasad K., Neprash H., Poplau S., Brown R.L., Williams E.S., Audi C., Linzer M. Factors Associated with Patient Trust in Their Clinicians: Results from the Healthy Work Place Study. Health Care Manag. Rev. 2022;47:289–296. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000336. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ferreira D.C., Vieira I., Pedro M.I., Caldas P., Varela M. Patient Satisfaction with Healthcare Services and the Techniques Used for Its Assessment: A Systematic Literature Review and a Bibliometric Analysis. Healthcare. 2023;11:639. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11050639. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gavurova B., Popesko B., Dvorsky J. Patient Satisfaction Determinants of Inpatient Healthcare. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2021;18:11337. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111337. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources