Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar 22;17(7):1109.
doi: 10.3390/nu17071109.

Education Practices of Dietitians Across Australia and New Zealand Around the Glycaemic Management of Dietary Fat and Protein in Type 1 Diabetes and the Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A Survey Evaluation

Affiliations

Education Practices of Dietitians Across Australia and New Zealand Around the Glycaemic Management of Dietary Fat and Protein in Type 1 Diabetes and the Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A Survey Evaluation

Evangeline Laurence et al. Nutrients. .

Abstract

Background/Objectives: International guidelines recommend that all children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) receive education on the glycaemic impact of fat and protein from diagnosis. In addition, the insulin strategy should be adjusted to compensate for fat and protein excursions. Data from continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) can guide insulin adjustment. This study sought to determine whether the current practices of dietitians in Australia and New Zealand align with guidelines. Methods: An anonymous, online survey of paediatric T1D dietitians working in tertiary centres (n = 20; Australia, n = 14, New Zealand, n = 6) was undertaken from February to March 2023. The Australian and New Zealand Society for Paediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes (ANZSPED) disseminated the survey link. The questionnaire covered three content domains: demographic information about the clinic and practitioner, the health professionals' education practices regarding fat and protein, and the use of CGM. Results: This pilot study had a 100% response rate, with a dietitian representative from all eligible centres responding on behalf of the diabetes team. Only 10% (n = 2) of respondents both (i) provided education on the glycaemic impact of fat and protein to all families at diagnosis and (ii) always provided insulin strategies to manage fat and protein where it impacted glycemia, as per guidelines. Barriers to education included a lack of procedure (47%, n = 7), consumer resources (40%, n = 6), and time (33%, n = 5). Reasons for not recommending strategies to manage fat and protein were perceptions that the family was overwhelmed (100%, n = 10) or not interested (60%, n = 6), and uncertainty of the best strategy (40%, n = 4). CGM was used by "almost all" respondents to educate and adjust the insulin strategy (90%, n = 18). Conclusions: Most dietitians surveyed were not consistently providing fat and protein education and management strategies to children with T1D in line with guidelines. CGM is a key tool routinely used by dietitians in nutrition education to help guide insulin adjustment. Dietitians need greater support through educational resources for families and training in evidence-based strategies to manage deglycation from dietary fat and protein to align with guidelines.

Keywords: child; continuous glucose monitoring; diabetes mellitus; dietary fats; insulin; type 1.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) The proportion of families that dietitians educate on the glycaemic impact of fat and protein. (B) The frequency at which dietitians provide strategies to manage fat and protein where there is evidence of an impact on glycaemia.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Timing of education delivered on the impact of fat and protein on postprandial glycaemia.

Similar articles

References

    1. Campbell M.D., West D.J., O’Mahoney L.L., Pearson S., Kietsiriroje N., Holmes M., Ajjan R.A. The relative contribution of diurnal and nocturnal glucose exposures to HbA1c in type 1 diabetes males: A pooled analysis. J. Diabetes Metab. Disord. 2022;21:573–581. doi: 10.1007/s40200-022-01015-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fisher C., Williman J., Burnside M., Davies H., Jefferies C., Paul R., Wheeler B.J., de Bock M. Children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes in Aotearoa New Zealand: An online survey of workforce and outcomes 2021. J. Paediatr. Child Health. 2024;60:222–228. doi: 10.1111/jpc.16566. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Burnside M.J., Williman J.A., Davies H.M., Jefferies C.A., Paul R.G., Wheeler B.J., Wiltshire E.J., Anderson Y.C., de Bock M.I. Inequity in access to continuous glucose monitoring and health outcomes in paediatric diabetes, a case for national continuous glucose monitoring funding: A cross-sectional population study of children with type 1 diabetes in New Zealand. Lancet Reg. Health West. Pac. 2023;31:100644. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100644. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Holmes-Walker D.J., Abraham M.B., Chee M., Jones T.W., Australasian Diabetes Data Network Study Group Glycaemic outcomes in Australasian children and adults with type 1 diabetes: Failure to meet targets across the age spectrum. Intern. Med. J. 2023;53:61–67. doi: 10.1111/imj.15426. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kiilavuori M., Varimo T., Tuomaala A.K., Pulkkinen M.A. Children and adolescent with suboptimal control of type 1 diabetes improve during the first 2 years on automated insulin delivery system. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2025;27:134–142. doi: 10.1111/dom.15992. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources