Time at High Risk of Hypoglycemia: Validation of a Consensus-Based Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Metric for Hospitalized Patients
- PMID: 40219621
- PMCID: PMC11993535
- DOI: 10.1177/19322968251331600
Time at High Risk of Hypoglycemia: Validation of a Consensus-Based Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Metric for Hospitalized Patients
Abstract
Background: Time at high risk of hypoglycemia (THRH), 3.9 to 5.6 mmol/L, is a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-based metric recommended for reporting in hospitalized patients. This study aims to validate THRH as a predictor of hypoglycemia.
Methods: The CGM data from 166 non-intensive care unit (non-ICU) inpatients with type 2 diabetes from the DIATEC trial were analyzed. All participants received basal-bolus insulin therapy. Of these, 82 were monitored with point-of-care glucose testing and blinded CGM, while 84 had open CGM. Linear and negative binomial regression analyses assessed the relationship between THRH and time below range (TBR) (<3.0 mmol/L, 3.0-3.9 mmol/L, and <3.9 mmol/L) and hypoglycemic events. Analyses were conducted for day (07:00-23:00), night (23:01-06:59), and 24-hour periods.
Results: For CGM-monitored patients, every 10%-point increase in THRH was associated with a 0.13%-point increase in TBR (<3.0 mmol/L) (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.06-0.21), 0.66%-point increase in TBR (3.0-3.9 mmol/L) (95% CI = 0.47-0.86), and 0.74%-point increase in TBR (<3.9 mmol/L) (95% CI = 0.51-0.97), all P < .001. A THRH threshold below 50% was linked to a TBR <3.9 mmol/L of less than 4%, as recommended. Similar results were observed during both day and night analyses and for point-of-care monitored patients, also for hypoglycemic events.
Conclusions: The THRH is strongly associated with hypoglycemia in non-ICU hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes on basal-bolus insulin. Aiming for THRH below 50% aligns with the recommended TBR target of <3.9 mmol/L below 4%, supporting THRH's role in guiding hypoglycemia prevention strategies.
Keywords: consensus; continuous glucose monitoring; hypoglycemia; inpatient; time at high risk of hypoglycemia.
Conflict of interest statement
The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: UPB received speaker fees from Sanofi and Novo Nordisk and has served on advisory boards for Sanofi, Novo Nordisk, and Vertex. Additional authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Based Metrics and Hypoglycemia Duration in Insulin-Experienced Individuals With Long-standing Type 2 Diabetes Switched From a Daily Basal Insulin to Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec: Post Hoc Analysis of ONWARDS 2 and ONWARDS 4.Diabetes Care. 2024 Apr 1;47(4):729-738. doi: 10.2337/dc23-2136. Diabetes Care. 2024. PMID: 38380954 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Glycaemia in low-premixed insulin analogue type 2 diabetes patients in a real-world setting: are the CGM targets met?Eur J Med Res. 2023 Mar 7;28(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01081-y. Eur J Med Res. 2023. PMID: 36882852 Free PMC article.
-
Hypoglycemia Incidence and Factors Associated in a Cohort of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Hospitalized in General Ward Treated With Basal Bolus Insulin Regimen Assessed by Continuous Glucose Monitoring.J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2020 Mar;14(2):233-239. doi: 10.1177/1932296818823720. Epub 2019 Jan 24. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2020. PMID: 30678495 Free PMC article.
-
Glucose Targets Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring Metrics in Older Adults With Diabetes: Are We There Yet?J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Jul;18(4):808-818. doi: 10.1177/19322968241247568. Epub 2024 May 7. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024. PMID: 38715259 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Sliding scale insulin for non-critically ill hospitalised adults with diabetes mellitus.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 29;11(11):CD011296. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011296.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30488948 Free PMC article.
References
-
- American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. 16. Diabetes care in the hospital: standards of care in diabetes—2025. Diabetes Care. 2025;48(Supplement_1):S321-S334. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/article/48/Supplement_1/S321/157551/16... - PMC - PubMed
-
- Olsen MT, Klarskov CK, Jensen SH, et al.. In-hospital DIAbetes management by a diabetes TEam and insulin titration algorithms based on Continuous glucose monitoring or point-of-care glucose testing in patients with type 2 diabetes (DIATEC)—a randomised controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2025;48(4):1-11. - PubMed
-
- Cavalcante Lima Chagas G, Teixeira L, R C Clemente M, et al.. Use of continuous glucose monitoring and point-of-care glucose testing in hospitalized patients with diabetes mellitus in non-intensive care unit settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2025;220:111986. - PubMed
-
- Olsen MT, Klarskov CK, Bjergaard UP, Hansen KB, Kristensen PL. Summary of clinical investigation plan for The DIATEC trial: inhospital diabetes management by a diabetes team and continuous glucose monitoring or point of care glucose testing—a randomised controlled trial. BMC Endocr Disord. 2024;24:60. - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources