Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: genetic and clinical characterization in a cohort of Polish patients and review of potential therapies
- PMID: 40220125
- DOI: 10.1007/s13353-025-00966-4
Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: genetic and clinical characterization in a cohort of Polish patients and review of potential therapies
Abstract
Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP; OMIM #135100) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by congenital malformation of the great toes and progressive heterotopic ossification of soft tissues. To date, the disease has been linked to 15 pathogenic variants in the ACVR1 gene, which encodes a type I receptor for bone morphogenetic proteins. Most patients with FOP carry a recurrent single-nucleotide substitution (c.617G>A; p.Arg206His) in the ACVR1 gene. The genotype-phenotype correlations for atypical pathogenic variants of ACVR1 are poorly understood. In this study, we report the largest population of Polish patients affected by FOP and analyze their phenotypes and genotypes. We screened the whole ACVR1 coding sequence of 16 patients affected by FOP to confirm the presence of pathogenic variants. Thirteen individuals carried the classic pathogenic variant (p.Arg206His) and had a classic or FOP-plus phenotype. In agreement with the findings of previous studies, one patient with a p.Gly356Asp pathogenic variant had a variant FOP phenotype. We point to an unusual phenomenon in two patients who carried atypical pathogenic variants (p.Gly356Asp and p.Arg258Ser) and displayed a classic FOP phenotype. Our study extends the understanding of FOP's genotype-phenotype correlation, suggesting that classic FOP phenotypes are associated with non-classic pathogenic variants. We also summarize the recent advances in drug development for this condition. Therefore, the study may be valuable for clinicians consulting patients with FOP.
Keywords: Activin A type I receptor gene (ACVR1); Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP); Genotype–phenotype correlations; Heterotopic ossification; Treatment strategies.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethical approval: This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Institutional Review Board of the Poznan University of Medical Sciences ethics committee. Consent to participate: Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study, while the parents consented on behalf of the index patient. Consent for publication: The authors affirm that the patients provided informed consent to publish the images in Fig. 4. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Classic and atypical fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) phenotypes are caused by mutations in the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) type I receptor ACVR1.Hum Mutat. 2009 Mar;30(3):379-90. doi: 10.1002/humu.20868. Hum Mutat. 2009. PMID: 19085907 Free PMC article.
-
Rapid Progression of Heterotopic Ossification in Severe Variant of Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva with p.Arg258Gly in ACVR1: A Case Report and Review of Clinical Phenotypes.Case Rep Genet. 2022 Aug 25;2022:5021758. doi: 10.1155/2022/5021758. eCollection 2022. Case Rep Genet. 2022. PMID: 36060212 Free PMC article.
-
A case of Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva associated with a novel variant of the ACVR1 gene.Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2021 Oct;9(10):e1774. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.1774. Epub 2021 Aug 4. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2021. PMID: 34347384 Free PMC article.
-
How Activin A Became a Therapeutic Target in Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva.Biomolecules. 2024 Jan 12;14(1):101. doi: 10.3390/biom14010101. Biomolecules. 2024. PMID: 38254701 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: clinical and genetic aspects.Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2011 Dec 1;6:80. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-6-80. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2011. PMID: 22133093 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Anwar S, Yokota T (2023) Navigating the complex landscape of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: from current paradigms to therapeutic frontiers. Genes (Basel) 14:2162. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14122162 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Aykul S, Huang L, Wang L, Das NM, Reisman S, Ray Y et al (2022) Anti-ACVR1 antibodies exacerbate heterotopic ossification in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) by activating FOP-mutant ACVR1. J Clin Invest 132:e153792. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI153792 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Bocciardi R, Bordo D, Di Duca M, Di Rocco M, Ravazzolo R (2009) Mutational analysis of the ACVR1 gene in Italian patients affected with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: confirmations and advancements. Eur J Hum Genet 17:311–318. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2008.178 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Bukowska-Olech E, Sowińska-Seidler A, Szczałuba K, Jamsheer A (2020) A novel biallelic splice-site variant in the LRP4 gene causes sclerosteosis 2. Birth Defects Res 112:652–659. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdr2.1676 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Cappato S, Traberg R, Gintautiene J, Zara F, Bocciardi R (2021) A case of Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva associated with a novel variant of the ACVR1 gene. Mol Genet Genomic 9:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.1774 - DOI
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources