Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 12;88(1):27.
doi: 10.1007/s00248-025-02524-1.

Inside the Belly of the Beast: Exploring the Gut Bacterial Diversity of Gonipterus sp. n. 2

Affiliations

Inside the Belly of the Beast: Exploring the Gut Bacterial Diversity of Gonipterus sp. n. 2

Rosa S Knoppersen et al. Microb Ecol. .

Abstract

The Eucalyptus snout beetle (Gonipterus sp. n. 2) is a destructive invasive pest of Eucalyptus plantations, responsible for significant defoliation and wood yield losses globally. Native to Australia, this beetle has adapted to thrive on diverse Eucalyptus hosts, overcoming their chemical defences. However, the mechanisms by which Gonipterus tolerates or utilises these plant defence metabolites remain poorly understood. In South Africa, Gonipterus sp. n. 2 poses a significant threat to Eucalyptus plantations by causing extensive defoliation and leading to substantial reductions in growth and wood production. This study investigates the relationship between diet, host Eucalyptus species, and the gut microbiome of Gonipterus sp. n. 2. Using controlled feeding experiments, beetles were reared on artificial, semi-artificial, and natural diets, as well as two Eucalyptus genotypes with distinct secondary metabolite profiles. High-throughput 16S rDNA sequencing and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) revealed significant shifts in gut bacterial diversity and composition across diets. Natural diets supported the most diverse microbial communities, while artificial diets fostered a homogenised microbiome dominated by opportunistic taxa like Serratia. Host-specific effects were observed in frass microbiota, with substantial biotransformation of monoterpenes into less toxic derivatives. The results highlight the plasticity of Gonipterus gut microbiota, which enables metabolic adaptability and resilience in diverse environments. This microbial flexibility underpins the invasiveness of Gonipterus, emphasising the role of gut symbionts in overcoming host chemical defences. Understanding these interactions offers novel insights for microbiome-targeted pest management strategies, providing a sustainable approach to mitigate the impact of Gonipterus on global Eucalyptus forestry.

Keywords: Eucalyptus snout beetle; Insect-microbe interactions; Invasive pests; Microbiome; Plant metabolites.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Experimental workflow to study the impact of various dietary treatments on bacterial biodiversity and plant metabolite breakdown within the gut of the Eucalyptus pest Gonipterus sp. n. 2
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Effects of diet and rearing environment on gut-associated bacterial biodiversity in Gonipterus sp. n. 2. A Taxonomic composition of bacteria in the gut up to order level. Numerical within the parenthesis beside taxon names indicate read number; B Venn diagram showing the number of shared and unique OTUs between the three diet and rearing environment sub-groups; D Shannon index, E Simpson index, F OTU richness (Chao1), and (G) principal coordinates analysis. Analyses of α and β diversity were conducted in Microbiomeanalyst 2.0. α diversity (Shannon, Simpson) and species richness (Chao1) were assessed on original data using Kruskal–Wallis tests. β diversity was analysed with normalised data using a Bray–Curtis based PCoA and evaluated with PERMANOVA and PERMDISP
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Foliar volatile content of Eucalyptus genotypes and Gonipterus frass. (A) Relative GCMS intensities of metabolites between plant and frass groups (B) Relative GC–MS peak intensities of volatile organic compounds in leaves of two Eucalyptus genotypes: Eucalyptus dunnii and Eucalyptus grandis × Eucalyptus urophylla. (C) Relative GC–MS peak intensities of volatile organic compounds in beetle frass after beetles consumed E. dunnii or E. grandis × E. urophylla host leaves. (D, E) Heatmap showing the relative concentrations of specific monoterpenes in Eucalyptus leaves and their biotransformation products in beetle frass after beetles were fed on leaves from E. dunnii and E. grandis × E. urophylla hosts. Data were normalised and log-transformed in Metaboanalyst 6.0 for PCoA generation. Additional processing and deconvolution of Eucalyptus genotypes and the associated frass samples were conducted in Mass Hunter, followed by normalisation and heatmap generation to compare the relative concentrations of metabolites across the samples
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Radial plot illustrating the taxonomic composition of bacteria in the gut and frass of Gonipterus sp. n. 2 after feeding on E. dunnii and E. grandis × E. urophylla. The plot was generated in Flourish. The numerical within the parenthesis beside each taxon indicates the read number. Overlapping taxa are marked with purple bullets
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Effects of feeding on E. dunnii and E. grandis × E. urophylla leaves on gut and frass-associated bacterial biodiversity in Gonipterus sp. n. 2. gut (AC) α diversity indices; D principal coordinates analysis. Frass (EG) α diversity indices; H principal coordinates analysis. Venn diagrams illustrating shared and unique OTUs between (I) the gut of beetles fed with Eucalyptus dunnii or E. grandis × E. urophylla, (J) the frass of beetles fed with E. dunnii or E. grandis × E. urophylla, K the gut and frass of beetles fed with E. dunnii. L The gut and frass of beetles fed with E. grandis × E. urophylla. M The gut of beetles fed with E. dunnii, E. grandis × E. urophylla, or the ‘natural’ sub-group from the field (see Fig. 1). α and β diversity analyses were performed using MicrobiomeAnalyst 2.0. α diversity was assessed using original data and Mann–Whitney tests. β diversity was analysed using a Bray–Curtis-based PCoA on filtered and normalised data, with statistical significance evaluated with PERMANOVA and PERMDISP

Similar articles

References

    1. Mapondera TS, Burgess T, Matsuki M, Oberprieler RG (2012) Identification and molecular phylogenetics of the cryptic species of the Gonipterus scutellatus complex (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Gonipterini). Aust J Entomol 51:175–188. 10.1111/j.1440-6055.2011.00853.x
    1. Schröder ML, Slippers B, Wingfield MJ, Hurley BP (2020) Invasion history and management of Eucalyptus snout beetles in the Gonipterus scutellatus species complex. J Pest Sci 93:11–25. 10.1007/s10340-019-01156-y
    1. Reis AR, Ferreira L, Tomé M, Araujo C, Branco M (2012) Efficiency of biological control of Gonipterus platensis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) by Anaphes nitens (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) in cold areas of the Iberian Peninsula: Implications for defoliation and wood production in Eucalyptus globulus. For Ecol Manage 270:216–222. 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.01.038
    1. Cooper PD (2001) What physiological processes permit insects to eat Eucalyptus leaves? Austral Ecol 26:556–562. 10.1046/j.1442-9993.2001.01142.x
    1. Salehi B, Sharifi-Rad J, Quispe C, Llaique H, Villalobos M, Smeriglio A, Trombetta D, Ezzat SM, Salem MA, Zayed A (2019) Insights into Eucalyptus genus chemical constituents, biological activities and health-promoting effects. Trends Food Sci Technol 91:609–624. 10.1016/j.tifs.2019.08.003

Substances

LinkOut - more resources