Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2025 May;10(5):105054.
doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105054. Epub 2025 Apr 11.

Exposure-response relationship of niraparib in maintenance therapy for recurrent ovarian cancer: ancillary analysis of the French GINECO-NiQoLe study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Exposure-response relationship of niraparib in maintenance therapy for recurrent ovarian cancer: ancillary analysis of the French GINECO-NiQoLe study

S Quesada et al. ESMO Open. 2025 May.

Abstract

Background: Interindividual variability in pharmacokinetics may influence clinical outcomes of niraparib in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC). We aimed to investigate the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) relationship of niraparib in 49 patients with ROC from the multicenter phase IV NiQoLe study.

Materials and methods: Steady-state trough concentrations (Cmin,ss) on days 8 (D8) and 90 (D90) after treatment initiation were analyzed in the PK-PD analysis in regard to early dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) during the first 3 months of treatment, self-reported adverse events [Patient-Reported Outcome version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)], and progression-free survival (PFS). Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify risk factors of toxicity and predictors of PFS, respectively.

Results: The starting dose was 200 mg/day in 39 patients (80%). Nineteen patients (39%) experienced early DLT. In multivariable analysis, the fourth quartile (Q4) of Cmin,ss at D8 (≥686 ng/ml) was identified as an independent risk factor for early DLT [odds ratio (OR) 27.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.99-392.53, P = 0.014] in contrast to the starting dose (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.04-4.76, P = 0.50). High Cmin,ss at D8 was also associated with grade ≥2 self-reported adverse events, including nausea (P = 0.03) and fatigue (P = 0.02). In univariate analysis, PFS was associated neither with the 200-mg starting dose [hazard ratio (HR) 1.25, 95% CI 0.59-2.62, P = 0.57] nor with Cmin,ss at D8 (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.90-1.19, P = 0.65). No difference in PFS was observed between Q4 and Q1-Q3 for Cmin,ss at D8 [174 days (95% CI 120 days-not reached) versus 242 days (95% CI 183-490 days), respectively; HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.57-2.36, P = 0.69]. Median PFS in patients who had a dose reduction was consistent with that of patients who remained at the starting dose [197 days (95% CI 166 days-not reached) versus 207 days (95% CI 176-469 days), respectively; log-rank P value = 0.29].

Conclusions: Increased plasma exposure at D8 (Cmin,ss ≥686 ng/ml) was associated with a higher risk of early DLT onset and patient-reported outcomes adverse events, without gain of efficacy in regard to PFS. Early plasma drug monitoring may be useful to prevent niraparib toxicity in patients with ROC treated in the maintenance phase.

Keywords: PK–PD relationship; drug monitoring; maintenance; niraparib; ovarian cancer; toxicity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Early dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurrence according to plasma trough concentration (Cmin,ss) of niraparib at days 8 and 90 after treatment start.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Occurrenceof dose-limiting toxicity(A)and progression-free survival(B)according to the fourth quartile (Q4, 686 ng/ml) and Q1-Q3 of niraparib trough concentration at day 8. DLT, dose-limiting toxicity.

References

    1. Ledermann J.A., Matias-Guiu X., Amant F., et al. ESGO–ESMO–ESP consensus conference recommendations on ovarian cancer: pathology and molecular biology and early, advanced and recurrent disease. Ann Oncol. 2024;35(3):248–266. - PubMed
    1. Quesada S., Fabbro M., Solassol J. Toward more comprehensive homologous recombination deficiency assays in ovarian cancer, part 1: technical considerations. Cancers (Basel) 2022;14(5):1132. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mirza M.R., Monk B.J., Herrstedt J., et al. Niraparib maintenance therapy in platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(22):2154–2164. - PubMed
    1. González-Martín A., Pothuri B., Vergote I., et al. Niraparib in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(25):2391–2402. - PubMed
    1. Berek J.S., Matulonis U.A., Peen U., et al. Safety and dose modification for patients receiving niraparib. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(8):1784–1792. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms