Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun:105:88-94.
doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2025.03.054. Epub 2025 Mar 31.

Characterizing the past 5 years of integrated plastic surgery applicants: A Texas STAR analysis

Affiliations

Characterizing the past 5 years of integrated plastic surgery applicants: A Texas STAR analysis

Eric Bao et al. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2025 Jun.

Abstract

Background: The Texas STAR (Seeking Transparency in Application to Residency) database is a new residency match database that provides data and subjective advice from successful and unsuccessful residency applicants to inform prospective applicants. This study used the database to elucidate the current trends in plastic surgery applicant statistics.

Methods: Self-reported survey data from applicants to integrated plastic surgery residency programs between 2020 and 2024 were obtained from the Texas STAR database. Objective statistics from all applicants were analyzed using linear and logistic regression models to determine their significance with regards to match outcomes. Subjective advice from successful and unsuccessful applicants was extracted and summarized into general themes.

Results: A total of 327 integrated plastic surgery applicants responded to the Texas STAR survey from 2020 to 2024. Among these applicants, 247 matched (75.5%) and 80 did not match (24.5%). Matched applicants had a significantly higher number of interviews offered (16.2 vs. 7.8, p = 0.000), United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 2CK score (256.5 vs. 253.1, p = 0.020), clerkships honored (4.4 vs. 3.6, p = 0.012), percentage taking research years (29.6% vs. 16.3%, p = 0.011), abstracts/posters/presentations (9.3 vs. 7.9, p = 0.002), peer-reviewed publications (6.7 vs. 5.2, p = 0.001), and interviews attended (14.0 vs. 9.1, p = 0.000). Other factors were not significant. Furthermore, applicants cited away rotations, letters of recommendation, connections, and mentors as important.

Conclusion: Number of applications, board scores, clerkship performance, research productivity, and leadership roles influence the number of interview invites, while the number of interview invites best predicted match status.

Keywords: Integrated plastic surgery; Plastic surgery match data; Plastic surgery residency; Texas STAR.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

LinkOut - more resources