Characterizing the past 5 years of integrated plastic surgery applicants: A Texas STAR analysis
- PMID: 40220587
- DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2025.03.054
Characterizing the past 5 years of integrated plastic surgery applicants: A Texas STAR analysis
Abstract
Background: The Texas STAR (Seeking Transparency in Application to Residency) database is a new residency match database that provides data and subjective advice from successful and unsuccessful residency applicants to inform prospective applicants. This study used the database to elucidate the current trends in plastic surgery applicant statistics.
Methods: Self-reported survey data from applicants to integrated plastic surgery residency programs between 2020 and 2024 were obtained from the Texas STAR database. Objective statistics from all applicants were analyzed using linear and logistic regression models to determine their significance with regards to match outcomes. Subjective advice from successful and unsuccessful applicants was extracted and summarized into general themes.
Results: A total of 327 integrated plastic surgery applicants responded to the Texas STAR survey from 2020 to 2024. Among these applicants, 247 matched (75.5%) and 80 did not match (24.5%). Matched applicants had a significantly higher number of interviews offered (16.2 vs. 7.8, p = 0.000), United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 2CK score (256.5 vs. 253.1, p = 0.020), clerkships honored (4.4 vs. 3.6, p = 0.012), percentage taking research years (29.6% vs. 16.3%, p = 0.011), abstracts/posters/presentations (9.3 vs. 7.9, p = 0.002), peer-reviewed publications (6.7 vs. 5.2, p = 0.001), and interviews attended (14.0 vs. 9.1, p = 0.000). Other factors were not significant. Furthermore, applicants cited away rotations, letters of recommendation, connections, and mentors as important.
Conclusion: Number of applications, board scores, clerkship performance, research productivity, and leadership roles influence the number of interview invites, while the number of interview invites best predicted match status.
Keywords: Integrated plastic surgery; Plastic surgery match data; Plastic surgery residency; Texas STAR.
Copyright © 2025 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Unveiling the Need to Improve Personalized Applicant Tools: A Critical Evaluation of the Reliability of the Texas STAR database in Predicting Match Success for Plastic Surgery Applicants.J Surg Educ. 2024 Sep;81(9):1320-1330. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.06.010. Epub 2024 Jul 20. J Surg Educ. 2024. PMID: 39034224
-
Predictors of Plastic Surgery Applicant Success: An Analysis of the Texas STAR Database.J Craniofac Surg. 2024 Jun 1;35(4):1084-1088. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000010153. Epub 2024 May 6. J Craniofac Surg. 2024. PMID: 38709027
-
Preference Signals and Away Rotations Greatly Influence Application Success in the Integrated Plastic Surgery Match.J Surg Educ. 2025 May;82(5):103467. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103467. Epub 2025 Feb 25. J Surg Educ. 2025. PMID: 40010264
-
Residency characteristics that matter most to plastic surgery applicants: a multi-institutional analysis and review of the literature.Ann Plast Surg. 2015 Jun;74(6):713-7. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000511. Ann Plast Surg. 2015. PMID: 25969975 Review.
-
Differences in the Academic Attributes of Matched and Unmatched Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Applicants are Narrowing.JB JS Open Access. 2023 Apr 13;8(2):e22.00138. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.22.00138. eCollection 2023 Apr-Jun. JB JS Open Access. 2023. PMID: 37063934 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous